Back
T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Vedula Yagneswara Chainulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER:
1. This Criminal Petition is filed seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) to petitioner/A.2 in Crime No. 320 of 2023 of Pendurthy Rural police station, Visakhapatnam District, registered for the offence under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’).
2. In summary, the Prosecution alleges that Accused No. 1 approached the de facto complainant, claiming that Accused No. 3 possessed power of attorney from Accused No. 2 for a parcel of land measuring 7.744 square yards in Sy. No. 7-4A3C of Narava Village, Pendurthy Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, using falsified documents. Acting as a mediator, A.1 facilitated an agreement to sell the land at Rs.1,50,00,000/- per acre to the de facto complainant and their associate, Kalvakota Sarath kumar. On 22.01.2020, a cheque of Rs.25,00,000/- was provided as advance payment to A.1. Subsequently, Kalvakota Sarath kumar transferred Rs.1,15,00,000/- in separate installments to A.1's account. Additionally, the de facto complainant transferred Rs.43,50,000/- and paid Rs.11,50,000/- in cash to A.1, totalling Rs.1,70,00,000/- in payments. However, it lat
The court held that mere allegations under serious IPC sections do not negate the applicability of Section 41A of Cr.P.C. when lesser penalties are involved, allowing anticipatory bail.
The court emphasized the need for careful scrutiny of allegations in anticipatory bail applications, balancing the rights of the accused with public interest, and clarified that locus standi is not a....
(1) Anticipatory bail petition – In a case containing severe allegations, Investigating Officer deserves a free hand to take investigation to its logical conclusion.(2) Notice before arrest – Discret....
The court established that anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations are primarily civil in nature and there is significant delay in filing the FIR, indicating potential abuse of the legal pr....
The limited scope of interference by the court in the process of investigation and the gravity of the allegations influenced the court's decision.
There must be a prima facie case for a cognizance order; if facts only reveal a civil dispute, the criminal proceedings cannot proceed.
The court emphasized the need to carefully evaluate the entire material against the accused, strike a balance between no prejudice to investigation and unjustified detention, and consider reasonable ....
Anticipatory bail is not to be granted routinely; it requires exceptional circumstances, and the court must assess the prima facie case and potential impact on the investigation.
The court emphasized the distinction between civil disputes and criminal offences, quashing the FIR due to lack of criminal intent in the allegations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
