Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
JITENDRA KUMAR
Ram Pukar Rai, Son of Saryug Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to cognizance of criminal charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments of the petitioner regarding innocence. (Para 5) |
| 3. petitioner's claims of innocence based on property transactions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. state's defense of the impugned order's legality. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. definition and scope of relevant ipc sections on forgery. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. analysis of forgery allegations regarding the sale deed. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. conditions for establishing forgery as outlined by precedent. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. criteria for section 420 ipc applicability not met. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. no evidence of conspiracy under section 120b ipc. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 10. complaint constitutes a civil dispute. (Para 32) |
| 11. impugned order quashed due to lack of criminal offense. (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT :
(JITENDRA KUMAR, J. )
The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner, under Section 482 Cr.PC, impugning the order dated 04.01.2016, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in Complaint Case No. 74 of 2013, whereby learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence punishable under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 and 120B
There must be a prima facie case for a cognizance order; if facts only reveal a civil dispute, the criminal proceedings cannot proceed.
It is well settled that in order to constitute an offence of cheating, it must be shown that the accused had fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making the representation or promise and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of alleged forgery, the court must consider the nature of the dispute, the absence of financial loss or loss of property, and the set....
The concealment of prior ownership during a property sale constitutes prima facie evidence of cheating, while insufficient evidence exists for forgery charges.
Failure to establish a prima facie case under Sections 417 and 465 of the IPC; lack of necessary sanction for prosecution of public servant mandates quashing of proceedings.
Term “criminal conspiracy” is defined under Section 120A of the IPC as to mean when two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done, an illegal act, or an act with is not illegal by illegal mean....
The court emphasized the distinction between civil disputes and criminal offences, quashing the FIR due to lack of criminal intent in the allegations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
