T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Parvataneni Vijaya Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP – Respondent
ORDER :
(T. Mallikarjuna Rao, J.)
1. The petitioners/A. 1 to A. 4 have filed the Criminal Petition, as per Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) seeking anticipatory bail concerning Crime No.219 of 2023 registered at the Rajahmundry II Town Police Station of East Godavari District.
2. A case has been registered against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 465, 467, 471 and 120-B, read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("I.P.C.").
3. Heard the arguments presented by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners/A.1 to A.4, as well as the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing respondent No.1/State and the learned counsel on behalf of respondent No.2/defacto complainant. Additionally, respondent No.2/defacto complainant has been included as party respondent by the order dated 14.12.2023 in I.A. No.02 of 2023.
4. In brief, the prosecution case is that the defacto complainant lodged a report stating that A.1, A.2 and A.4 have approached one Vemuri Indira Devi, who is the mother-in-law of the defacto complainant and borrowed Rs.1.50 Crores by mortgaging plot admeasuring 977 Sq. Yards in Sy. No.385, si
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra
Arnesh Kumar V. State of Bihar
The court emphasized the need for careful scrutiny of allegations in anticipatory bail applications, balancing the rights of the accused with public interest, and clarified that locus standi is not a....
(1) Anticipatory bail petition – In a case containing severe allegations, Investigating Officer deserves a free hand to take investigation to its logical conclusion.(2) Notice before arrest – Discret....
The court established that anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations are primarily civil in nature and there is significant delay in filing the FIR, indicating potential abuse of the legal pr....
The court held that mere allegations under serious IPC sections do not negate the applicability of Section 41A of Cr.P.C. when lesser penalties are involved, allowing anticipatory bail.
The court emphasized the need to carefully evaluate the entire material against the accused, strike a balance between no prejudice to investigation and unjustified detention, and consider reasonable ....
It is well settled that in order to constitute an offence of cheating, it must be shown that the accused had fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making the representation or promise and ....
The court established that allegations of forgery and cheating can coexist with civil disputes, allowing for criminal proceedings to continue.
The court emphasized the need for custodial interrogation based on prima facie evidence of forgery, and highlighted the balance between personal liberty and societal interest in granting anticipatory....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.