Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Dr. V R K Krupa Sagar, J
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Parvathareddi Rajesh Naidu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(V.R.K. KRUPA SAGAR, J.)
1. MACMA.No.2320 of 2012 under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “the MV Act”) is filed by the appellant/ insurance company impugning the order dated 31.01.2012 of the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims tribunal – Cum – V Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in MVOP.No.1000 of 2007.
2. MACMA.No.2325 of 2012 under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is filed by the appellant/ insurance company impugning the order dated 31.01.2012 of the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims tribunal – Cum – V Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in MVOP.No.999 of 2007.
3. MACMA.No.3786 of 2012 under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is filed by the appellant/ claimant impugning the order dated 31.01.2012 of the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims tribunal – Cum – V Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in MVOP.No.999 of 2007.
4. MACMA.No.2274 of 2015 under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is filed by the appellant/ claimant impugning the order dated 31.01.2012 of the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims tribunal – Cum – V Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in MVOP.No.1000 of 2007.
5. Every personal lif
The court ruled that the absence of the Tata van's driver and insurer did not invalidate claims against the lorry driver, who was solely at fault, and emphasized the need for just compensation reflec....
The court affirmed that the Insurance Company is liable for compensation despite the absence of a driving license for the driver, emphasizing the need for sufficient evidence to support claims agains....
The compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and needed to be enhanced as the Tribunal failed to consider compensation on some of the conventional heads and committed an illegality in awar....
Compensation for injuries must reflect a fair assessment of pain, suffering, and loss of income, even exceeding claimed amounts if justified by evidence.
The court determined that the insurance company is liable for compensation due to reckless driving by the offending vehicle, and recalibrated the amount based on findings of total disability and nece....
Point of law : Compensation - Tribunal should adopt equitable principles and reasonable approach for determination of just compensation.
Compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act must be just and reasonable, reflecting the claimant's actual loss, including permanent disability and income loss.
The liability of the owner and insurer in accidents involving motor vehicles, and the entitlement to compensation in the absence of fault or negligence on the part of the driver.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
