Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati, J
Boya Nagamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Ravi Cheemalapati, J.
Questioning the action of the respondents more particularly 4th respondent in recording the name of the 5th respondent in revenue records vide Khata No.524 in respect of petitioner’s land in Sy.No.198-D to an extent of Ac.5.61 cents situated at Halaharvi Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Kurnool District the present writ petition is filed.
2. Heard Sri Butta Vijaya Bhasker, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for Revenue and Sri Marella Radha, learned Counsel for respondent No.5.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while reiterating the contents of the affidavit submitted that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the subject land as reflected in the Revenue Records. In the year 2016, without notice to the petitioner, the name of the 5th respondent was mutated by the revenue authorities in the revenue records, as such grievance has been raised before the authorities concerned by way of complaint for deletion of the 5th respondent name and to incorporate her name. Accordingly, the revenue authorities have set right the revenue records and once again mutated the petitioner’s name. Subseq
The existence of an alternative statutory remedy under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 precludes the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
