IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J.
North Coastal Mega Food Park Private Limited and Others - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 4201/2021
Decided On : 13-02-2025
(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Mandamus - Petitioners sought to declare the refusal of the Zonal Manager, APIIC, to allot land for a Mega Food Park as arbitrary and unconstitutional - The MoU dated 25.02.2018 was executed for establishing the project, with land earmarked for allotment - The Zonal Manager's unilateral decision to refund the initial payment was deemed illegal and contrary to the principles of natural justice. (Paras 1-10)
(B) Legitimate Expectation - The court emphasized that the principle of legitimate expectation was violated by the Zonal Manager's actions, as the petitioners had incurred significant expenses based on the MoU and prior approvals. (Paras 23-24)
Facts of the case:
The petitioners entered into a MoU with the Government for establishing a Mega Food Park, but faced delays in land allotment and payment due to various administrative issues and the COVID-19 pandemic. (Paras 2-7)
Findings of Court:
The petitioners failed to comply with the terms of the MoU and did not deposit the required land cost, leading to the dismissal of their writ petition. (Paras 28-34)
Issues: The main issues included the legality of the Zonal Manager's refusal to allot land and the petitioners' compliance with the MoU. (Paras 1, 10, 34)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners did not create any enforceable rights due to their failure to comply with the MoU, and thus were not entitled to relief. (Paras 28-34)
Result: Writ Petition dismissed.
ORDER:
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J.
The instas filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Petitioners for the following reliefs:
“..to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the letter of the Zonal Manager, APIIC, Srikakulam, No. Z0/SKLM/VZMDT/NCMF/ 2020/407, dated 29.12.2020 refusing petitioners request dated 15.09.2020 to receive the land cost of Rs 7,34,31,525/- in respect of Acres 70.18 cents in Sy No.22 to 25 and 79 to 84 in Basavapalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District and deciding to refund the initial payment made by the Company as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the principles of natural justices and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to allot the land of Acres 70.18 cents in Sy No.22 to 25 and 79 to 84 in Basavapuram Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District to the petitioners and issue Final Approval for setting up Mega Food Project and pass..”
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
The case of the Writ Petitioners is that a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 25.02.2018 was executed between the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the Petitioners for the establishment of a Mega Food Park in Basavapalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District. Pursuant to the aforesaid MoU, a land measuring Ac. 70.18 cents, which includes Ac.50.21 cents of assigned land and Ac.19.97 cents of Government Land covered in Sy.Nos.22 to 25 and 79 to 84 in Basavapalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, was earmarked by the Government to alienate said land to APIIC and for onward allotment to the 1st Petitioner.
The 1st Petitioner is a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, on 10.05.2018. The 1st Petitioner was incorporated by the 2nd Petitioner, primarily, for establishment of Mega Food Park with infrastructure facilities for production, processing and preservation of meat, fish, fruit, vegetables oils, fats etc.,
The Government of India, as part of its economic policy desired to set up its first coastal economic corridor called East Coast Economic Corridor (ECEC), covering 2500 KM of India’s coastline running across the entire East Coast of India from Kolkata to Kanyakumari to promote trade and business. The first phase of ECEC is Visakhapatnam – Chennai Industrial Corridor (VCIC) which had been approved by the Asian Development Bank Board in October, 2016. The project to be set up by the Petitioners was to become part of this network.
3. Accordingly, the Collector, Vizianagaram District vide his letter dated 24.08.2018 and 30.08.2018 intimated to Zonal Manager, APIIC, Srikakulam Industrial Estate, that the market value is fixed @ Rs.12.5 lakhs per acre for the assigned lands in Basavapalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal. The Zonal Manager, APIIC, Industrial Estate, Srikakulam vide his correspondence dated 31.08.2018 intimated to the 1st Petitioner that the revised demand of land cost for assigned land admeasuring Ac.46.43 cents @ Rs.12,50,000/- per acre is coming to Rs.5,80,37,500/- and the government land admeasuring Ac. 18.00 cents @ Rs.5,00,000/- is coming to Rs.90,00,000/- respectively totaling an amount of Rs.6,70,37,500/- and thereby directed the 1st Petitioner to deposit the processing fee of Rs.16,10,750/- arrived @ 25,000/- per acre and EMD @ Rs.20,000/- per acre, and GST @ 18% on process fee calculated to Rs.2,89,935/- totally an amount of Rs.31,89,285/- in APIIC Bank Account. In compliance of the above, the 1st Petitioner by way of DD No.997182, dated 07.09.2018 drawn on SBI deposited Rs.31,89,285/- to the account of APIIC as processing fee and EMD, including GST.
4. The Collector, Vizianagaram on the request received from the Zonal Officer and on verifying the correspondence submitted by RDO, Vizianagaram and the Tahsildar, Bhogapuram Village vide his correspondence dated 03.02.2019 communicated to the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Vijay
The court ruled that failure to comply with the terms of a MoU negates any enforceable rights, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
Petitioners cannot assert rights for land allotments when their claims are contingent on another party's pending applications, especially after such approvals have expired.
A concluded contract requires mutual agreement on essential terms, including payment and delivery, without which claims to the land become unenforceable.
The court held that administrative authorities must act within legal bounds, and their inaction in issuing NOC and executing Sale Deed was arbitrary, necessitating compliance with conditions for reli....
Point of law: Absence of an award in terms of the provisions of the Act, the reference as made to the L.A.R.R. Authority as was done by the District Level Negotiations Committee would have no legal e....
The court ruled that land allotments within a wildlife sanctuary require proper authority and compliance with legal procedures, rendering unauthorized allotments void.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing a reasonable opportunity for the parties to present their case.
The court upheld the resumption of industrial land due to the failure of the allottee to operate business while recognizing the need for orderly reallocation based on seniority among competing claima....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.