Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
K. Bhagya Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
B. Veera Venkatarao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.)
This Appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure [for short 'the C.P.C.'], is filed by the Appellant challenging the decree and judgment, dated 28.01.2000 in O.S.No.95 of 1989 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry [for short 'the trial Court'].
2. The 1st appellant herein is the defendant and respondents herein are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.95 of 1989. During the pendency of the appeal, the 1st appellant died and her sole legal representative is brought on record as 2nd appellant.
3. The respondents/plaintiffs filed the suit for delivery of possession of the plaint schedule property after evicting the defendant there from, and for damages of Rs.2,200/- till date of suit, for future damages till delivery of possession and for costs of the suit.
4. Both the parties in the Appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.
5. The brief averments of the plaint in O.S.No.95 of 1989 are as under:
The plaintiffs are the owners of the plaint schedule site and other sites covered by S.No.93 of Rajahmundry Rural area. They have demarcated their land for house sites and made layout and got it approved by Town Pla
A party must demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations to invoke protections under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act.
An unregistered possessory agreement does not confer rights to the property and cannot be enforced for possession under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act.
(1) Part Performance – To claim benefit under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 there shall be necessary pleadings – In absence of necessary pleadings, benefit under the provision cannot....
Civil Law - Dismissal of suit for permanent injunction and restoration of possession in suit property - provision of order VII, Rule II(b) that a Court has to come to a finding that relief claimed ha....
It is true that agreement for sale does not create any interest in property sought to be purchased as contemplated under Section 54 of the T.P. Act. Once the transferee becomes a full owner on transf....
Suit filed simpliciter for injunction where claim is founded purely to claim protection under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act is not maintainable. Such a suitor is not entitled to claim reli....
A plaintiff seeking specific performance must demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform the contract; failure to do so negates the right to enforce the agreement.
The doctrine of part-performance under Section 53A requires a valid contract and necessary parties; absence of these precludes claims under this section.
The court emphasized that the defense of adverse possession cannot be claimed if it is contradictory to the main defense of ownership, and that the benefit under section 53A of the TPA can only be cl....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
