Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
3310 - K MANMADHA RAO
k.sandhyarani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Order :
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“…..to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction order or orders declaring the action of the 2nd respondent herein in issued the demand notice vide Ref.No.AFC/A/c.No.68025002&3/2022-23/2933, dt.16-02-2023 under sec 29 of SFC Act, 1951 demanding her to clear the dues of Rs.70.14 lacks which is contrary to letter No.303413-39/1/2017/853995/Chaitanya Aqua Industries, dt.28-11-2022 sent by the 5th respondent herein to the 2nd respondent as wholly arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and void and violated the principles of natural justice and affected her rights guaranteed under article 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned notice dt.1602.2023 issued under sec. 29 of the SFC Act as contrary to the conditions 6.4.4, 6.4.10 and 6.4.11 of G.O.Ms.No.108, Industries and Commerce Department, dt.14-11-2015 as well as 5th respondent’s 303413- 39/1/2017/853995/Chaitanya Aqua Industries, dt.28-11-2022 with reference to the M/s Chaitanya Aqua Industry, Sy.No.3
The court upheld the validity of recovery actions under the SFC Act when a borrower fails to meet loan obligations, affirming adherence to natural justice principles in administrative actions.
The petitioner, as a secured creditor, can raise the claim for a share in the interest amount before the respondent No.1 as directed in the previous judgment.
The order of the BIFR is appealable under section 25 of SICA and the writ application is not entertainable. The jurisdiction of the BIFR to give direction to the Authority providing services to the S....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the fulfillment of conditions is essential for receiving government subsidies, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel may not apply if the co....
Subsidy claims under the Poultry Venture Capital Fund are contingent upon strict adherence to procedural guidelines; failure to comply negates entitlement, especially after scheme closure.
Eligibility for government subsidies under the TUFS scheme cannot be denied due to procedural lapses of the Nodal Bank, upholding the principle that accrued rights must be honored.
The main legal point established is that the entitlement to subsidies under the WBSSIS-2008 should be determined based on the specific provisions of the Scheme, and the refusal of subsidies based on ....
The State Financial Corporation is not liable under a decree for a defaulting borrower without compliance with notice requirements and jurisdictional procedures; attachment of its assets for past deb....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
