IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY, SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA, JJ
Telugu Jambulaiah, S/o. Pedda Yellaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor High court of Judicature at Hyderabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. Suresh Reddy, J.
Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence recorded by judgment dated 30-06-2017 in Sessions Case No. 531 of 2008 on the file of the Court of learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool (for short, 'the trial Court'), accused Nos. 1 and 3 to 6 therein filed the present criminal appeal before this Court.
2. Originally, the police filed charge sheet against accused Nos. 1 to 5. During the pendency of trial, accused No. 2 died and therefore case against him was dismissed as abated by order dated 16-09-2011 and one Telugu Ramanjaneyulu was added as accused No. 6 as per the orders in Criminal M.P.No. 441 of 2012 dated 22-04-2015. As such, accused Nos. 1 and 3 to 6 faced trial. On 10-02-2025 when the appeal was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the appellants informed this Court that the appellants-accused Nos. 5 and 6 died pending the criminal appeal which fact was not disputed by learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. Accordingly, this Court, by order dated 25-02-2025, has dismissed the appeal against the appellants-accused Nos. 5 and 6 as abated. Consequently, the present appeal is taken up and considered o
The conviction of the accused was overturned due to unreliable witness testimonies and lack of credible evidence supporting the prosecution's case.
The court established that a single blow without intent to kill does not meet the threshold for murder under Section 302 IPC, allowing for a conviction under Section 304 IPC instead.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases relying on circumstantial evidence, and the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused.
The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt; failure to do so results in acquittal.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimony can lead to acquittal.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; insufficient evidence led to the acquittal of the accused.
The judgment underscores the principle that an acquittal should not be overturned without compelling evidence, emphasizing the importance of consistent and reliable witness testimonies in criminal ca....
The court established that eyewitness consistency and forensic evidence can substantiate a murder conviction, even in the face of claims regarding delayed reporting.
The judgment underscores the principle that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in cases involving serious charges like murder.
The court affirmed the conviction for murder and destruction of evidence, emphasizing the accused's failure to provide a reasonable explanation for the death of his wife.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.