K. SURESH REDDY, K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Mekanuru Gopal, Harijanawada – Appellant
Versus
State Of Ap. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.Suresh Reddy, J.
All the eight accused in S.C.No. 28 of 2012 on the file of the Court of learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore (for short, 'the trial Court'), filed the present criminal appeal before this Court. During pendency of the appeal, accused Nos. 2 and 8 are reported to have died and therefore the appeal against accused Nos. 2 and 8 is dismissed as abated. All the accused were tried by the trial Court under the following five charges:
II charge was under Section 148 against all the accused;
III charge was under Section 341 IPC against all the accused;
IV charge was under Section 324 IPC against all the accused;
and
V charge was under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC against all the accused.
2. Substance of the charges is that on 28-02-2011 at about 8 p.m., all the accused armed with deadly weapons, with the common object, formed into an unlawful assembly and intercepted one Chiramana Haribabu @ Hari (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') in front of the shop of P.W.4 while he was going on a motorcycle and hacked him with axes and knives causing his death and in the said process,
The judgment underscores the principle that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in cases involving serious charges like murder.
The conviction under conspiracy and murder was overturned due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, highlighting the need for beyond reasonable doubt to establish guilt.
The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt; failure to do so results in acquittal.
The court established that a single blow without intent to kill does not meet the threshold for murder under IPC Section 302, warranting a conviction for grievous hurt instead.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; insufficient evidence led to the acquittal of the accused.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimony can lead to acquittal.
The judgment underscores the importance of credible evidence in criminal cases, particularly when relying on circumstantial evidence without eyewitness testimony.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for reliability and consistency in witness testimonies and evidence presented by the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doub....
In cases where a single blow is inflicted with a blunt object, without an intention to cause death, the offense may be scaled down from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting....
The conviction of the accused was overturned due to unreliable witness testimonies and lack of credible evidence supporting the prosecution's case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.