Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K Suresh Reddy, T.C.D.Sekhar
K.Sunkamma, Ananthapuramu Dt., W/o Late Veerappa – Appellant
Versus
M.Lakshmi Nageswara Reddy Anantapuram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.Suresh Reddy, J.
Feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 10-05-2017 in S.C.No.207 of 2014 on the file of the Court of learned Special Sessions Judge for trial of cases under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act – cum – VIII Additional Sessions Judge, Ananthapuramu (for short, 'the trial Court'), the appellants-accused Nos. 3, 5 and 6 filed Criminal Appeal No. 713 of 2017 and the appellants- accused Nos. 2 and 4 filed Criminal Appeal No. 725 of 2017. Aggrieved by the acquittal of accused Nos. 1 and 7, de facto complainant-P.W.1 filed Criminal Appeal No. 784 of 2017.
2. Since all these criminal appeals arise out of the same Sessions Case, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The appellants-accused Nos. 2 to 6 along with accused Nos. 1 and 7 were tried by the trial Court under the following charges:
I charge was under Section 148 IPC against accused Nos. 1 to 6;
II charge was under Section 109 read with Section 302 IPC against accused Nos. 1 and 7;
III charge was under Section 302 IPC against accused Nos. 2 to 6;
IV charge was under Section 307 IPC against accused Nos. 2 to 6; and
V charge was under S
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimony can lead to acquittal.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; insufficient evidence led to the acquittal of the accused.
The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt; failure to do so results in acquittal.
The judgment underscores the importance of credible evidence in criminal cases, particularly when relying on circumstantial evidence without eyewitness testimony.
A conviction cannot be sustained on the sole testimony of a child witness when there are serious doubts regarding its reliability and the absence of corroborative evidence.
Long delay in holding test identification parade will weaken prosecution case.
The judgment underscores the principle that the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in cases involving serious charges like murder.
The conviction under conspiracy and murder was overturned due to insufficient and unreliable evidence, highlighting the need for beyond reasonable doubt to establish guilt.
The conviction of the accused was overturned due to unreliable witness testimonies and lack of credible evidence supporting the prosecution's case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
