Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA, J
Haneef Moinuddin Shaik – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
V.Sujatha, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short “Cr.P.C.”) to quash the proceedings in Crime.No.335 of 2020 of Mutyalareddypalli Town Police Station, Tirupati Urban District for the offence registered under Section 420 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short (“I.P.C”).
2. The petitioners herein are accused Nos.1 & 2 and the 2nd respondent herein is the de-facto complainant. The 2nd respondent herein lodged a complaint alleging that the petitioners/A1 & A2 along with A3 induced her and her friend by name one M. Sujatha to purchase the land situated in an extent of 104.16 ankanams at plot No.130 in Sy.No.557 of Peruru Village, Tirupathi Rural and received an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- from her and her friend and the petitioners/A1 & A2 executed agreement of sale dated 25.07.2020 by promising them that they will execute register sale deed for the said land and the balance amount of Rs.30,00,000/- was agreed to be paid on or before 10.09.2020. But, the petitioners/A1 & A2 did not register the subject land in favour of the de-facto complainant and her friend, and registered the same to others. It is further alleged that petiti
The court held that criminal proceedings cannot continue when the underlying dispute is civil in nature, to prevent abuse of the judicial process.
Criminal proceedings cannot be maintained when the underlying dispute is purely civil, especially if a civil suit is pending.
The court established that criminal proceedings cannot be maintained when the underlying dispute is purely civil in nature.
Criminal proceedings cannot be maintained when the underlying dispute is purely civil, as it constitutes an abuse of the judicial process.
Criminal proceedings cannot be maintained when the underlying dispute is purely civil, to prevent abuse of the judicial process.
The court established that civil disputes should not be cloaked as criminal offenses, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of criminal intent to sustain charges of cheating.
The court established that civil disputes should not be mischaracterized as criminal offenses to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
The court established that civil disputes should not be cloaked as criminal offenses to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process when complaints are motivated by civil disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
