IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J.
T. Venkateswarlu (Hc 1472 ), and Others – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos.27026 and 27865 Of 2024
Decided On : 29-01-2025
(A) Andhra Pradesh Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1966 - Rules 2(b)(ii) and 15 - Promotion criteria for Sub Inspectors - Petitioners challenged the promotion of juniors without proper seniority list - Court found adherence to rules and dismissed the petitions. (Paras 9, 11, 22, 23)
(B) Seniority - Determination based on first appointment date - Court ruled that seniority must be reckoned from the date of initial entry into the grade. (Paras 14, 20)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, enlisted as Police Constables in 1989, challenged the promotion of juniors to Sub Inspectors without a proper seniority list, claiming violation of service rules.
Findings of Court:
The respondent authority adhered to the relevant rules in preparing the seniority list and promoting candidates.
Issues: Whether the respondent authority failed to adhere to the rules regarding seniority and promotion criteria.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that seniority must be determined by the date of first appointment in the relevant category, dismissing claims for retrospective seniority.
Result: Both writ petitions dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenged promotion of juniors (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners claim violation of rules (Para 7) |
| 3. court discusses adherence to rules (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. seniority determined by first appointment (Para 14) |
| 5. writ petitions dismissed (Para 24) |
ORDER :
(SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J.)
Since the issue involved in these two writ petitions is the same, they are disposed of by a common order.
2. The petitioners, working as Head Constable (HC) and Assistant Sub Inspectors of Police (ASIs) in the SPSR Nellore District filed the above two writ petitions, impugning the Fax/Radio Message vide C.No.1142/A1/2024 dated 19.11.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent to all the Superintendents of Police, Guntur Range for sending 58 ASIs/WASIs fit to act as S.Is (civil) for attending Pre-promotional training course, without preparing provisional integrated common seniority list and calling objections from all the stakeholders and publishing Final Seniority List, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Rule 34 of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules,1996.
3. Petitioners were enlisted/appointed as Police Constables (civil) in the year 1989 in the office of the 5th respondent-Superintendent of Police, Nellore. All the petitioners, along with, other police constables in Prakasam District were sent to pre-promotional training, fit to act as Head Constables (civil), on 18.01.2012 at Tirupati. After completion of pre- promotional training, the petitioners were promoted to Head Constables on 22.06.2012, whereas the police constables of Prakasam District were promoted to Head Constables on 09.06.2012. The next promotion is Sub Inspector of Police (S.I) and it is a zonal post. The Guntur range consists of Guntur, Bapatla, Palnadu, Prakasam and Nellore Districts. The 3rd respondent initially issued Fax/Radio message vide C.No.1142/A1/2024 dated 06.11.2024 to all the Superintendents of Police, Guntur Range to identify 70 ASIs/WASIs to conduct a Departmental Qualifying Examination to HCs/ASIs (civil) fit to act as S.Is (civil). Thereafter, Fax/Radio Message vide C.No.1142/A1/2024 dated 19.11.2024, impugned herein, was issued, identifying 58 candidates, sending them to the pre-promotional training course commencing from 02.12.2024 to 11.01.2025. Though the petitioners are seniors as per their enlistment as Police Constables, they were ignored and the juniors, enlisted after them as Police Constables names were forwarded. Hence, the writ petition.
4. a) A counter affidavit was filed by the 3rd respondent. It was contended, interalia, that the petitioners were initially appointed as Police Constables on 09.06.1989 and later promoted as Head Constables on different dates i.e. 20.06.2012, 22.06.2012, 25.08.2012 and 27.08.2012. In Prakasam District, the police constables of the 1992 batch were promoted to Head Constables (civil) on 09.06.2012. Based on the seniority lists of the respective units, a consolidated probable list was prepared. Only the senior HCs/ASIs were taken into account, according to their date of regularization as HC (civil). No junior in the cadre of HCs/ASIs (civil) were called for the Departmental Qualifying Examination for undergoing pre-promotional training of HCs/ASIs fit to act as S.Is (civil). The date of enlistment as PCs (civil) is not a criterion for pre-promotional training.
b) In Order No.73 of A.P. Police Manual, the periods of service in a rank are prescribed as conditions precedent to promotion to the next “higher rank”, in which for promotion to the cadre of Sub Inspectors (civil) minimum service of 5 years as HCs/ASIs (civil), have to be taken as criteria. Accordingly, a Radio Message in C.No.1142/A1/2024 dated 06.11.2024 was issued calling willingness/unwillingness of HCs/ASIs as per the promotion dates in the cadre of Head Constable to attend the Departmental Qualifying Examination. As per the common integrated seniority list dated 01.11.2024, the petitioners
Seniority for promotions must be determined by the date of first appointment in the relevant category, not by enlistment in a lower rank.
The court held that seniority must be established based on actual service dates, not retrospective adjustments, reinforcing the principles established in prior rulings regarding promotions and upgrad....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.