Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
Paidi Sandhya – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief :
2. The facts of the case are that a Notification was issued by 5th respondent authorities in the month of September, 2021 for appointment to the post of Anganwadi worker across the Anganwadi Kendras in Narasannapeta, Srikakulam District. In pursuance of the same, the petitioner applied for the said post among a large number of candidates and later the respondent issued call letter for interview/selection to attend on 28th September, 2021 at the office of Project Director, DW & CDA, Srikakulam but it was cancelled and another call
The selection of candidates for public service positions must adhere strictly to established criteria, including educational qualifications and performance in interviews; courts may not interfere unl....
The court's direction to appoint the petitioner in place of the selected candidate was based on the principles of fairness and justice, considering the oversight made by the selection committee and t....
The court affirmed that selection for Anganwadi Worker positions must follow established criteria, including local residency and performance in interviews, without bias towards higher qualifications.
The eligibility criteria for Anganwadi Workers does not require passing a specific subject, only the ability to read and write Odia, which the petitioner fulfilled despite the conflicting certificati....
Eligibility criteria for recruitment cannot be altered mid-process without proper notification, ensuring fairness and adherence to established rules.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
