Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, HARINATH NUNEPALLY
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. , Rangapuram, Vellore – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J :
The appellant herein which is a Public Sector Corporation involved in Fabrication, Erection and Operation of various machines had entered into an agreement with M/s. NREDCAP for installation of wind tools for generation of electricity.
2. The appellant had received a notice dated 05.06.2015 under Section 41-A of the Indian STAMP ACT , 1899 from the 2nd respondent herein. In this notice, the 2nd respondent, on the basis of information supplied by the Vigilance and Enforcement Department, Anantapuram had stated that the appellant, was involved in execution of a project, worth of Rs.1,500/- crores, under an agreement executed between the appellant and M/s. NREDCAP. The 2nd respondent, after stating the above facts, estimated that the unregistered agreement should have been stamped with Rs.75/- l
A show-cause notice issued without jurisdiction, particularly regarding unregistered documents, is invalid and may be challenged to prevent unwarranted legal action.
The court established that insufficiently stamped documents cannot be admitted in evidence unless the required stamp duty and penalties are paid, emphasizing the distinct roles of courts and the Dist....
Procedural non-compliance in property valuation hearings renders resulting orders invalid, necessitating fresh proceedings to ensure parties are duly notified and allowed to participate.
The court confirmed that a document evidencing possession transfers its status from an agreement to a conveyance, thus imposing requisite stamp duty as per statutory provisions.
The correct procedure to be adopted in cases where the dispute is about the true market value of the property is as per subsections (4) and (5) of Section 32A of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The ....
District Registrar and Collector, Hyderabad and others v. Canara Bank and others
-
Read summaryAnirudhsinhji Karansinhji Jadeja and another v. State of Gujarat
-
Read summaryCanara Bank and others v. District Registrar and Collector, Registration and Stamps Department and others
-
Read summaryHariom Agarwal v. Prakash Chand Malviya
-
Read summaryK.I. Shephard and others v. Union of India and others
-
Read summaryPrajay Engineers Syndicate Ltd., Hyderabad v. District Registrar and Collector
-
Read summaryShekhar Ghosh v. Union of India and another
-
Read summaryT. Ranjeeth Singh v. State of Telangana 2017 (3) ALD 476
-
Read summaryWhirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and others
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.