SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 323

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
BIPIN GUPTA
JITENDRA NATH SACHHAR S/O SRI SAI DASS SACHHAR – Appellant
Versus
YODJRAJ S/O SHRI SAI DASS SACHHAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

BIPIN GUPTA, J.

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 19.01.2026, passed by learned District Judge, Jhalawar, in Civil Suit No.121/2024, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff–respondent under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1899”) corresponding to Section 39 of the Rajasthan Stamps Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1998”) read with Section 49(c) of the Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1908”) has been allowed. The learned trial Court, while holding that the partition agreement in question is unregistered and, therefore, inadmissible in evidence, directed that the said document be impounded and placed in record in “Part D” of the case file.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff–respondent instituted a suit for partition and possession of joint family property. In response, the defendant–petitioner filed a written statement denying the averments made in the plaint.

2.1 During the course of proceedings, the plaintiff–respondent filed an application under Section 35 of the Act of 1899 read with Section 49(c) of the Act of 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top