SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 558

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J.
Punyamnanthula Lovaraju S/o Kamaraju - Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 22040 of 2025
Decided On : 21-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vijay Mathukumilli

The failure to follow proper procedures in issuing encroachment notices violates due process rights, requiring evidence of longstanding possession to be considered before further action.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Encroachment Notice - Writ petition challenging the legality of Show Cause Notice issued by Gram Panchayat alleging encroachment on burial ground land - Petitioners have possessed the land for over 40 years and were not properly notified before action was taken. (Paras 1-2, 4-10)

(B) Principles of community land protection - Gram Panchayat's duty to protect public/community properties under G.O.Ms.No.188 and Section 55 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Importance of due process in cases of alleged encroachment, requiring both substantive and procedural checks. (Paras 7-11)

(C) Fair hearing principles - Requirement of a reasonable explanation and opportunity for petitioners to substantiate their claims regarding possession before the Gram Panchayat proceeds further. (Paras 11-13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners have resided on the disputed land since 40 years, performing agricultural operations. A Show Cause Notice was issued without following the procedures mandated by law.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the petitioners to provide evidence of their possession while ensuring the Gram Panchayat considers their submissions before taking further action and ordered a status quo regarding the property in question.

Issues: Whether due process was followed in issuing the encroachment notices and the need for evidence of longstanding possession by the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of following established legal procedures in cases of land disputes and recognized the petitioners' rights to a fair hearing.

Result: The Writ Petition is disposed of with directions for the Gram Panchayat to consider the petitioners' submissions.

Table of Content
1. seeking relief against encroachment notice. (Para 1 , 3)
2. response to encroachment proceedings involving community land. (Para 4 , 5 , 7 , 11)
3. necessity of proper survey for encroachment determination. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12)
4. submission of evidence required for possession claim. (Para 8 , 13)
5. writ petition disposed without costs. (Para 14)
-.

ORDER :

1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“Pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order direction, declaring the action of the 4 Respondent in issuing Show Cause Notice vide Rc. No. 02/Encroachment Notice/2025, dated 06-08-2025, alleging that the Petitioners encroached graveyard land to an extent of (Ac. 0.20 cents, Ac. 0.187 cents, Ac. 0.204 cents, Ac. 0.094 cents, Ac. 0. 02 cents, Ac. 0.264 cents, Ac. 0.093 cents, Ac. 0.027 cents, Ac. 0.093 cents, Ac. 0.21 cents and Ac. 0.125 cents) out of Ac. 3.41 cents in Survey No. 207, Old Manjeru Village, Kajuluru Mandal, Kakinada District, despite knowing the fact that the Petitioners are residing in the same property since 40 years and taxes also levied and further trying to disposes the Petitioners without considering the explanations given by them on 13-08-2025, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently quash/set aside the said notice and all action taken pursuant thereto and pass.”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Revenue and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Gram Panchayat.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in possession of the land to an extent of Ac.0.20 cents, Ac.0.187 cents, Ac.0.204 cents, Ac.0.094 cents, Ac.0.02 cents, Ac.0.264 cents, Ac.0.093 cents, Ac.0.027 cents, Ac.0.093 cents, Ac.0.21 cents and Ac.0.125 cents out of Ac.3.41 cents respectively in Survey No.207, Old Manjeru Village, Kajuluru Mandal, Kakinada District, since four decades and they have been eking out their livelihood by doing agricultural operations in respect of the subject lands.

4. However, the 4th respondent-Gram Panchayat issued show-cause notices dated 06.08.2025 to the petitioners without conducting and demarcation in accordance with law a proper survey as prescribed under the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 (for short, 'the Act'), and without issuing any prior notice. Hence, the Writ Petition.

5. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader for furnished a copy of written instructions issued by the Revenue has 4th respondent, wherein, it is stated that the land in Sy.No.207 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.3.41 cents, has been classified and notified as a Government burial ground for the benefit of the public or entire villagers of the respondent-Gram Panchayat.

6. While being so, the subject property which is situated in the said survey number has been encroached upon by the petitioners herein, along with some Others from the same village. To identify these encroachments, the respondents have conducted a survey and found that the petitioners, in total of 18 individuals, have occupied the land as described in the impugned notices dated 06.08.2025, thereby preventing its use for the purpose for which it was designated and notified.

7. It is further submitted that, in accordance with the terms of G.O.Ms.No.188, dated 21.07.2011, and Section 55 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, the Gram Panchayat, which is a local authority and custodian of community properties that are vested with the 1st respondent, has duty bound to protect such properties. Accordingly, in compliance with G.O.Ms.No.188, the Gram Panchayat initiated steps for the removal of encroachments in accordance with the Provisions of Section 98 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

8. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that let the petitioners m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top