SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 589

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.
Thummathati Rajasekhar @ Potti Raja, S/o. Thummatha – Appellant 
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Repl: by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi – Respondent 
Criminal Petition No: 8075 OF 2025
Decided on : 14-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri C. Subodh, Advocate

Pre-arrest bail can be granted in the absence of substantial evidence despite political bias and delays in lodging complaints, emphasizing the inadmissibility of co-accused confessions in bail determinations.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 409, 417, 465, 467, 471, 120(b), 109, 506(2), 386 r/w 34 - Pre-arrest bail sought in connection with allegations of cheating and extortion by transport associations - Delay of over two years in lodging FIR - Political bias considered but not determinative for bail decision. (Paras 1, 11, 12)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory bail application - Standard of prima facie evidence required, importance of political vendetta as context, and limitations on the admissibility of co-accused statements - A co-accused's confession is inadmissible against others at bail stage. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail related to a case involving allegations of cheating transport owners in connection with inflated freight charges, where the main accused had political backing. The FIR was filed after a considerable delay.

Findings of Court:
The court found that existing materials were insufficient to deny bail; thus, pre-arrest bail was granted under strict conditions.

Issues: The primary issues were the admissibility of a co-accused's confession and the significance of political bias in considering the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi: Political bias and the delay in filing the complaint do not override the insufficiency of concrete evidence against the petitioner, warranting bail with conditions.

Result: Criminal Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of pre-arrest bail petition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's observations on factual background. (Para 3 , 6 , 9)
3. arguments for and against bail application. (Para 4 , 5)
4. legal standards and analysis of evidence. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's conclusion and conditions for bail. (Para 13 , 14)
-

ORDER:

Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.

1. The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity 'the BNSS '.) by the petitioner for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.167 of 2025 of Muttukur Police Station, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 409 , 417, 465, 467, 471,120(b), 109, 506(2), 386 r/w 34 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short 'the IPC').

2. Facts, in brief, of the case are that the de-facto complainant is the owner of F.S. transport. Accused No.1, who was elected as Member of Legislative Assembly was involved in all the illegal activities by using his designation. with strong support of Accused No.1, Accused Nos.2 to 9 planned to cheat the container transporters with an intention to wrongful gain and started three associations in the month of August, 2021 and maintained offices in the vacant place of Nadavala Sekhar. They increased transport charges with their own interest and issued orders to the owners of the containers. In continuation of this practice, on 11.04.2022, they issued orders to pay the increased charges on the name of KCPT transport association. Accused Nos.2 to 9 cheated and collected huge amount from the owners and issued fake bills and extorted amount from other transport owners. While the drivers refused to pay the charges, the accused threatened them with dire consequences. They started illegal business and collapsed the system with an intention to gain huge money and degrade the honor of Krishnapatnam port. Hence, the case was registered.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

4. Sri C.Subodh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence and he was falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner would abide by any condition to be imposed by this court.

5. Per contra, Ms. P.Akhila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail stating that the petitioner has indulged in the offence highhandedly, there is prima-facie case is made out against the petitioner some more material witnesses have to be examined investigation is not completed if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, he would not be available for the investigation and he would escape from the clutches of law and urged to dismiss the bail petition.

6., As seen from the record, it appears that there are disputes in between two associations, one is, Krishnapatnam Transport Association and the other is, Krishnapatnam Container Transport Owners Association. The latter one was old. The Krishnapatnam Transport Association, members three in number, were induced into Krishnapatnam Container Transport Owners Association. The alleged transactions occurred in between 2021-2023. Even as per the case of the prosecution, it is the incident originated in the year 2021. F.I.R was lodged on 07.06.2025. The main accused/Accused No.1 was enlarged on regular bail by the learned IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, Nellore, in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.927 of 2025 in crime No.167 of 2025 of Muthukuru Police Station on 10.07.2025.

-7. The object of the above mentioned two Associations is to help the members in getting maximum rates to their services ass per clause 7 (3) of the Memorandum, of Association. It is the allegation of the prosecution that the petitioner and other accused created their own check post and there was no check post as per the directions of the Government or Transport Authorities.

8. The allegation is that during the year 2021, when the trailers sent fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top