SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 797

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Rudraraju Rukmini – Appellant
Versus
P. Kondal Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Siva Reddy

Table of Content
1. identifying the parties involved and context of the accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defense arguments regarding liability and insurance. (Para 6 , 8)
3. court findings on negligence and compensation parameters. (Para 10 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. arguments of appellants and respondents. (Para 11 , 12)
5. final compensation determination and modifications. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J.

I. Introduction:-

1. This appeal is directed against the order and decree dated 09.11.2015 passed in M.V.O.P.No.51 of 2013 by the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, at Rajahmundry [for short “the learned MACT”], where under a claim made for awarding compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- for the death of one Rudraraju Venkatalakshmi Narasimha Raju (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) in a road traffic accident, by his legal heirs and dependents, was allowed by granting of compensation of Rs.6,31,900/-. Feeling aggrieved thereby, the present appeal is filed by the claimants.

2. Claimant No.1 is the wife, claimant Nos.2 and 3 are daughters and claimants Nos.4 and 5 are sons of the deceased.

3. Respondent No.1 is the driver and respondent No.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top