ORDER :

Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.

The Criminal Revision Case has been preferred under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C’) challenging the judgment dated 25.03.2010 in Crl.A.No.28 of 2009 passed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry, modifying the conviction for the offence from Section 326 of ‘the IPC.,’ to Section 324 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short ‘the I.P.C’) and sentencing him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only), and, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days, as against the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- imposed by the learned I Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, in S.C.No.334 of 2008 dated 09.02.2009 finding the revisionist guilty, under Section 235 (2) of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’ for the offence punishable under Section 326 of ‘the IPC.’

2. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

3. Sri Y. Sudhakar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, whilst reiterating the grounds of the r