Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI NATH TILHARI, CHALLA GUNARANJAN
T.K. Narayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Harigopal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of the original suits leading to lok adalat awards. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. observations related to execution court procedures and outcomes. (Para 6 , 8 , 15 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. arguments on the mandatory nature of filing draft sale deeds. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's rationale for considering the word 'may' as directory. (Para 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 31) |
| 5. interpretation of rule 34 cpc regarding draft deed requirements. (Para 18 , 19 , 39) |
| 6. conclusion on the lack of merits in the appeal. (Para 37 , 38 , 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT :
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
1. Heard Sri Kiran Kumar Vadlamudi, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Damaraju Madhusudhan Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 7.
2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant/judgment debtor No.1 under Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (in short ‘CPC’) challenging the order dated 08.08.2024 passed in E.P.No.226 of 2023 in Lok Adalat Award No.4199/2021 in O.S.No.166 of 2017 Lok Adalat Award No.4285/2021 in O.S.No.172 of 2017 Lok Adalat Award No.4284/2021 in O.S.No.173 of 2017 Lok Adalat Award No.4283/2021 in O.S.No.174 of 2017 Lok Adalat Award No.4286/2021 in O.S.No.175 of 2017 Lok
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
