Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NINALA JAYASURYA, SUMATHI JAGADAM
Iska Vijaya Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
N.Vijaya Krishna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case context and parties (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendant’s defenses against specific performance (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. plaintiff's claims in the injunction case (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. evidence and testimony of various parties (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's analysis on specific performance (Para 15 , 19 , 34) |
| 6. final ruling on specific performance and injunction (Para 73 , 74) |
Judgment :
Ninala Jayasurya, J.
1. These four appeals arise out of a common Judgment and Decree dated 26.06.2014 in O.S.No.37 of 2004 and O.S.No.62 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Nellore.
2. O.S.No.37 of 2004 was filed by Mr.N.Vijaya Krishna against Mr.Vijayakumar Reddy & another seeking a decree for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale dated 24.07.2003 in respect of land admeasuring Ac.6.03 cents situated in Survey Nos.1125, 1126, 1130/A, 1130/B and 1131/A of Nellore Bit-II Revenue Village. Mr.Vijayakumar Reddy filed O.S.No.62 of 2006 (renumbered on transfer of O.S.No.375 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Nellore) against Mr.N.Vijaya Krishna seeking Permanent Injunction from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment o
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
