Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K.MANMADHA RAO
Mustooru Venkataramana – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“……to issue a Writ or order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in including the land in Sy No 550 in an extent of Ac 0 06 cents of Tadipatri Village, Ananatpur district, in the list properties belonging to the Hindu Religious Institutions Endowments furnished to the 4th respondent in his proceedings Lr in Rc No NN1/34576/07 dated 29.12.2008, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the civil court decrees and consequently set aside the same and direct the 4th respondent to register the document in respect of land in Sy No 550 in an extent of Ac 0 06 cents of Tadipatri Village,Ananatpur district, as and when the same is presented and pass……”
2. Brief facts of the case are that the 1st petitioner had purchased an extent of Ac.0.06 cents in Sy. No 550 of Tadipatri village, with specific boundaries, from the 2ndpetitioner and his two brothers by names Chinna venkataramana and Venkata sivudu, under a registered sale deed dated No.3405/1995 dated 16.12.1995. Now the 2nd petitioner along with
Ownership disputes regarding lands belonging to religious institutions must be resolved through the Endowments Tribunal, making writ petitions under Article 226 inappropriate.
The High Court cannot entertain writ petitions related to land disputes already being adjudicated in specialized tribunals, directing parties to follow appropriate legal channels for resolution.
Ownership disputes regarding endowment property should be resolved by the Endowments Tribunal, not through writ proceedings under Article 226.
Disputes regarding title over land belonging to charitable institutions must be addressed by the Endowments Tribunal, making writ petitions under Article 226 not maintainable.
Writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable for disputes that fall under the jurisdiction of specialized tribunals, necessitating petitioners to seek remedies through the appropriate statut....
Point of law: A person being a special Commissioner is not competent to discharge the duties of Commissioner of Endowments. Undisputedly, the Commissioner is working and the post of Commissioner is n....
A purchaser under an unregistered sale deed does not acquire any right or interest in the immovable property.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the remedy under Section 25(1) of the Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1951 is an efficacious remedy for the trust to recover the proper....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
