Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO, HARINATH.N
Shaik Shamsunniasa – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP – Respondent
ORDER :
(per Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) Heard Sri Manikanta Thota, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The detenue was named as an accused in four criminal cases, whose details are given below:
| Sl.No. | Crime No. | Police Station | Offences under Sections |
| 1. | Crime No.653/2023 Dated 22-06-2023 | Nallapadu Police Station | U/S 384 of I.P.C |
| 2. | Crime No.210/2023 Dated 23.06.2023 | Lalapet Police Station | U/S 384 of I.P.C |
| 3. | Crime No.214/2023 Dated 26.06.2023 | Lalapet Police Station | U/S 386 altered to Section 394 of I.P.C. |
| 4. | Crime No.212/2023 Dated 26.06.2023 | Kothapet Police Station | U/S 386 r/w 34 of I.P.C. |
3. He was arrested in all the above four cases on 29.06.2023. While he was in judicial custody, an order of detention, dated 14.07.2023, was passed by the 2nd respondent. This was approved by the 1st respondent on 25.07.2023 and subsequently confirmed, on 19.09.2023, after receiving the recommendations of the Advisory Committee.
4. The 2nd respondent in his order, dated 14.07.2023, had directed detention of the detenue in Central prison, Rajamahendravaram, for a period of one year. The grounds of detention were that the detenue
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
