Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
S.Krishnaiah – Appellant
Versus
B.Mallika Rjuna – Respondent
ORDER:
V R K KRUPA SAGAR, J.
1. This Criminal Revision Case, under sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC, is filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated 23.04.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.56 of 2021 in C.F.No.81 of 2021 of learned IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Tirupati, Chittor District.
2. Heard arguments of Sri D.Purna Chandra Reddy, the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2/State.
3. Notice on respondent No.1 was served on 26.08.2023, none entered appearance.
4. On demonstration of illegality or impropriety or the correctness or otherwise of the proceedings taken up before the courts below, law calls for interference of this court in revisional jurisdiction. The present case at hand could be stated to be an example of all incorrect proceedings taken up by the court below. A brief narration of what happened before the court below would be sufficient for disposal of this revision.
5. For a tractor with its trolly bearing registration No.AP 03 CL 1204, originally, Sri B.Mallikarjuna is stated to be the registered owner. On 12.07.2018 for a valid consideration of Rs.5,00,000/-, it was stated to have been sold to Sri S.Kri
A Magistrate must take cognizance of a complaint disclosing an offence and follow due process; failure to do so renders subsequent orders invalid.
Interim custody of seized vehicle granted due to risk of deterioration outweighing retention value.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
