Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI NATH TILHARI, CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Suryas Ravi Prakash Rao – Appellant
Versus
Mohithe Manohar Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
1. Heard Sri K.P. Abhiram, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Vivekananda Virupaksha, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3.
FACTS:
2. This appeal under Section 47 of the Guardian & Wards Act, 1890 (for short, the G.W. Act, 1890) has been filed by the appellant-father of the minor son Chi. Suryas Srivatsav (in short "Ward") seeking his custody under Sections 9 , 10 and 23 of the G.W. Act, 1890, from the respondents‟ custody, being aggrieved from the order of rejection of his petition G.W.O.P.No.13 of 2020 by order dated 12.12.2022 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Ananthapuram.
3. The respondents 1 to 3 are the maternal grandfather, grandmother and uncle of the ward respectively.
4. The appellant was married to late Jyothi Manohar. Out of their wedlock, the son Chi Suryas Srivatsav was born. On 04.09.2017, in an incident at the appellant‟s home, his wife died, during treatment in Chandra Hospital. The respondents registered Crime No.146 of 2017 of IV Town Police Station, Ananthapuram under Sections 498-A, 302 and 201 read with Section 34 IPC against the appellant and his parents. It is the appellant‟s case that the respondents t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
