SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1168

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
BATTU DEVANAND, A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, JJ.
The State Of AP Irrigation And Cad (R And R) Dept, Rep By Its Principal Secretary – Appellant
Versus 
Sk Mod Rafi, S/o Late Masson Saheb – Respondent
Writ Appeal No: 1289 Of 2023, Writ Appeal No: 315 Of 2024
Decided On : 19-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
GP for Services III (AP), S.V. Muni Reddy, Vivekananda Virupaksha, K. Koutilya

Displaced persons are entitled to employment under G.O.Ms.No.98 provisions; all affected parties must be included for fair process in judicial decisions.

Headnote:(A) G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (Proj.Wing) Department, dated 15.04.1986 - Employment quota for displaced persons - Petitioners contend they were displaced due to the Kandaleru Reservoir project and seek inclusion in employment lists. The learned Single Judge's order setting aside the second seniority list for individuals affected by the displacement was determined not in violation of principles of natural justice as affected parties were not included. (Paras 4, 6, 10)

(B) Principles of Natural Justice - Rulings affirm that parties significantly impacted should have the right to be heard before decisions affecting their rights are made. The process must ensure all affected individuals are notified and given an opportunity to present their case. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The writ petitioner applied for employment based on displacement due to the Kandaleru Reservoir project. His father was awarded due compensation prior to the application. His request was denied since it was deemed time-barred and because he was not included in the relevant seniority list. The appellants sought to maintain their inclusion in the second seniority list as displaced persons.

Findings of Court:
The learned Single Judge's order was overturned based on violations of natural justice principles, allowing affected parties an opportunity to be heard. The Court restored the Government Memo and directed the inclusion of the writ petitioner in the first seniority list.

Issues: The main issues were the entitlement of the writ petitioner to employment under displacement quota as per G.O.Ms.No.98 and the validity of the learned Single Judge's order as it related to affected parties not being part of the judicial process.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court determined that established protocols for the processing of claims under G.O.Ms.No.98 must allow for prior opportunities for all affected parties, asserting that the decision made without their input contravened fundamental fairness.

Result: The appeals were allowed, restoring the previous Government Memo and directing appropriate employment actions.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and writ appeals (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's background and claims for employment (Para 4)
3. state's response and arguments against petitioner's claims (Para 5 , 6)
4. issues raised for consideration (Para 7)
5. court's reasoning and discussion on issues (Para 8 , 9)
6. conclusions and directions for relief (Para 10 , 11)

Judgment :

Battu Devanand, J.

The Writ Appeal Nos.1289 of 2023 and 315 of 2024 have been filed against the order, dated 05.01.2023 in W.P. (AT) No.47 of 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court.

The Writ Appeal No.1289 of 2023 filed by the State whereas Writ Appeal No.315 of 2024 filed by the persons, who are aggrieved by the said order, seeking relief of the Court.

2. Since the issue involved in both the writ appeals is one and the same and the order under challenge in both the appeals is also one and the same, the two writ appeals are disposed of by a common judgment.

3. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides and carefully perused the material available on record.

4. Submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner:

(i) The father of the writ petitioner late Sri Massom Saheb in W.A.No.1289 of 2023 is resident of Dachuru village Kaluvoya Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. The village of Dachuru and neighbouring villages were submerged under Kandaleru Reservoir Project. The petitioner belongs to BC- E community and passed S.S.C. in the year 1994 and also Senior Secondary School Examination in the month of December, 2010. The father of the petitioner died on 10.02.2010 leaving behind him and 6 of his family members. The Special Deputy Collector i.e., 4th respondent issued a proof of award vide special RGC No.118/2015, dated 05.10.2015. The Tahsildar of Kaluvoya Mandal i.e., 5th respondent herein issued displacement certificate in L.Dis.(A) 914/2015, dated 06.10.2015 certifying that the father of the petitioner shifted their residence from Dachuru village, Kaluvoya Mandal to Autonagar Works Colony, Padarrupalli, Nellore Mandal since their house was submerged under Kandaleru Reservoir in Dachuru village. The 5th respondent also issued no earning member certificate, dated Nil.08.2015. It is the contention of the petitioner that as per the said documents, the petitioner is displaced person since his house was submerged under Kandaleru Reservoir and as such he is entitled to claim employment in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (Proj.Wing), dated 15.04.1986 and as per the orders and instructions issued by the State Government from time to time.

(ii) The grievance of the petitioner is that the District Collector, SPSR, Nellore District i.e., 3rd respondent herein sent the second seniority list of displaced persons under Kandaleru Reservoir on 30.12.2011 and 30.01.2014 for necessary approval of the Government. After examining the same, the second seniority list of 106 displaced persons under Kandaleru Reservoir sent by the 3rd respondent was approved by the 1st respondent. In the second seniority list containing 106 candidates, petitioner name is not shown, though he is eligible as per the scheme. Against the action of the respondents in not including his name in the second seniority list approved in Government Memo, dated 26.12.2014, he approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal by filing O.A.No.649 of 2016. Subsequently, the said O.A. was transferred to the Andhra Pradesh High Court and it was renumbered as W.P. (AT) No.47 of 2021. The said writ petition was disposed of by the learned single Judge of this Court by order, dated 05.01.2023 setting aside the Memo No.641/R&R- A2/2012-2, dated 26.12.2014 issued by the 1st respondent wherein 106 displaced persons names included in the second seniority list. The learned single Judge also directed the official respondents to consider the case of the petitioner to include his name in the seniority list under displaced persons quota of Kandaleru Reservoir Project for appointment in any suitable post as per his e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top