SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1175

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
BATTU DEVANAND, A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, JJ.
The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department – Appellant
Versus
Anakarla Ravi Kumar, S/O. A. Yesuratnam @ B Bala Obaiah –Respondent
Writ Appeal No: 841 Of 2023
Decided On : 19-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Gp For Services III (AP)
For the Respondent: Moka Kondala Rao

Displaced persons are entitled to job applications beyond prescribed deadlines due to government policies and prior judicial rulings that relax such limitations.

Headnote:(A) G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (Proj.Wing) Department, dated 15.04.1986; Government Memo No.480-LAR(2)/87-2, I&CAD (Proj.Wing) Department, dated 24.08.1987 - Employment for displaced persons - Applications submitted by the petitioners were rejected as time barred, leading to a challenge in court - Despite the rejection, the court noted that since the displacement occurred in 2005, and the government had previously relaxed time restrictions, the applications should be reconsidered. (Paras 4, 8, 12)

(B) Legal Principle - The court emphasized that the relief for displaced persons must be considerate of their prolonged applications and prior government orders, which allow for flexibility regarding submission timelines. (Paras 11, 12)

(C)

Findings of Court:
The State's rejection of applications was deemed unsustainable given longstanding policies to support displaced persons. (Paras 10, 12)

(D)

Issues: The primary issue was whether the applications were indeed time-barred, especially in light of past governmental relaxations of deadlines. (Paras 6, 10) (E)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that existing governmental orders offering employment to displaced individuals supersede the alleged timeliness of applications, affirming the need for compliance with prior judgments favoring such petitions. (Paras 10, 12) (F)

Result: Writ appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. appeal background and displacement history. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. state's contest against the writ petition. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's rejection of the state's defense. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. conclusion on the sustainability of state's actions. (Para 10 , 11)

Judgment :

Battu Devanand, J.

1. This Writ Appeal is preferred by the State against the order, dated 19.07.2022 in W.P.No.19065 of 2022.

2. Both the parties in the Appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the Writ Petition for convenience.

3. Heard, the learned Government Pleader for Services-III appearing for appellants/respondents and Sri Moka Kondala Rao, learned counsel for the respondents/writ petitioners and carefully perused the material available on record.

4. The case of the writ petitioners is that the lands of the petitioners’ family are required in the year 1984 and 1985 for Sri Pothuluri Veera Brahmendra Reservoir of Telugu Ganga Project, B Mattam Mandal. The petitioners are displaced persons affected in the said reservoir. The competent authorities issued displaced certificates to all the petitioners. The petitioners submitted their applications on 06.12.2006, 12.12.2006, 27.05.2008 and 31.01.2009 respectively requesting to provide employment under the displacement scheme as per G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (Proj.Wing) Department, dated 15.04.1986. The said applications are rejected by the 2nd respondent by order, dated 16.09.2020 on the ground that the applications are submitted after cutoff date. It is stated in the rejection order, dated 16.09.2020 that the actual date of displacement of all the families under Telugu Ganga Project is 19.09.2005 and displaced persons under Telugu Ganga Project have to submit their applications for employment on or before 18.09.2006. Aggrieved by the rejection order, dated 16.09.2020, as it is contrary to the Government Memo No.480-LAR(2)/87-2, I&CAD (Proj.Wing) Department, dated 24.08.1987 and as per the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.14913 of 2010 & batch, order of rejection is challenged in the writ petition. The learned single Judge by order, dated 19.07.2022 considering the submissions made on both sides that the issue in that writ petition is squarely covered by order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.13543 of 2019, dated 01.02.2022 and considering the submissions of the learned Government Pleader that the order in Writ Petition No.13543 of 2019 has become final, the learned single Judge is pleased to allow the writ petition by order, dated 19.07.2022 setting aside the impugned proceedings, dated 16.09.2020 and directed the writ petitioners to submit relevant documents referred to in the impugned order within a period of one month and on submissions, the appropriate authority is directed to consider the case of the writ petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (Proj.Wing) Department, dated 15.04.1986 and also on par with the order of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.9807 of 2009, dated 21.08.2009 within a period of three (03) months therefrom.

5. Dissatisfied with the said order, the State preferred the present writ appeal.

6. The main ground raised in this writ appeal filed by the State is that the applications submitted by the writ petitioners are time barred and the order in W.P.No.13543 of 2019 on which the learned single Judge relied and allowed Writ Petition No.1906 of 2019 is already under challenge before this Court in Writ Appeal No.356 of 2023.

7. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the State contends that in view of the subsequent instructions issued under various memos subsequent to issuance of Government Memo No.480-LAR(2)/87-2, I&CAD (Proj.Wing) Department, dated 24.08.1987, the writ petitioners are not entitled to seek employment as their applications are time barred.

8. We are unable to accept the contention of the learned Government Pleader on the following grounds:

Admittedly, the writ petitioners are the family members of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top