SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1173

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AT AMARAVATI
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.
K. Suresh Babu - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department and others. - Respondents
Writ Petition No.34107 of 2025
Decided On : 10-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri
For the Respondent:Ms. Jhansi Lakshmi, Ld. A.G.P representing O/o Advocate General appearing Sri Vivek Chandrasekhar, Ld. Counsel

The court determined that indirect elections for Mayor can proceed despite the short duration remaining in the current term, affirming distinct treatment from direct elections subject to statutory restrictions.

Headnote:(A) Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 2(10), 6, 7, and 90 - Writ Petition challenging Notification for election of Mayor - Grounds for challenge include the timing of the election and statutory provisions prohibiting elections before term expiry - Court held that indirect elections for Mayor do not fall under direct election restrictions of the Act - Future vacancy issues considered if petitioner prevails in related case. (Paras 4, 14-18)

(B) Jurisdiction of Election Commission - Authority to regulate elections is judicially reviewable; must adhere to principles of legality and rationality. (Para 12)

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges election notification on grounds of timing and legal irregularities. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. election commission's authority is subject to judicial accountability. (Para 10 , 12)
3. court upholds that indirect elections for mayor are permissible within statutory timeline. (Para 14 , 16)

ORDER :

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.

Heard Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Ms. Jhansi Lakshmi, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader representing O/o Advocate General appearing for Respondent Nos.1 & 4 and Sri Vivek Chandrasekhar, Ld. Counsel for the State Election Commission appearing for the Respondent No.2.

2. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:

“It is therefore prayed, that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notification No.217/SEC-f1/2025, dated 04.12.2025 issued by the respondent No.2 directing the respondent No.3 to authorize the respondent No.4 for conduct of election of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation to fill up the Casual Vacancy occurred in the office of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation, eventhough, the ordinary election for all the members shall be conducted on or before February, 2026 as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, quite contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

SUBMISSIONS OF THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE WRIT PETITIONER:

3. It is submitted by the Ld. Senior Counsel for the Writ Petitioner that the Writ Petitioner was a former Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation; that the Writ Petitioner was elected as a Mayor of the Kadapa Municipal Corporation on 18.03.2021 for a term of five years; that in the normal course, the term of the Writ Petitioner as Mayor would end by 17.03.2026; whereas, the Writ Petitioner had suffered disqualification and was removed from the Mayorship vide G.O.Rt.No.1016, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (G) Department, dated 23.09.2025 (Ex.P.3); that the said removal was on account of alleged irregularities committed by the Writ Petitioner during execution of the Civil Contract Works within the jurisdiction of Kadapa Municipal Corporation through the firm M/s. Vardhini Constructions (which is owned by his immediate family members); that the Writ Petitioner has challenged the G.O.Rt.No.1016, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (G) Department, dated 23.09.2025 (Ex.P.3) in W.P.No.26724 of 2025 and the same is pending on the file of this Hon'ble Court; that in the meantime, the Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission (Respondent No.2) had issued Notification No.217/SEC-F1/2025, dated 04.12.2025 (Ex.P.1) for filling-up of the casual vacancy i.e., Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation which has occurred on account of disqualification of the Writ Petitioner herein; that the Annexure to the Notification dated 04.12.2025 would indicate that the Notice would be given in Form-II by the District Collector or the Joint Collector of Y.S.R.Kadapa District on or before 07.12.2025 and the Special Meeting for conduct of election of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation would be held at 11 AM on 11.12.2025, and that the 'Note' therein would stipulate that if for any reason election to the Office of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation is not held on 11.12.2025, it shall be held on the next date and even on the said date if the Mayor could not be elected, the matter shall be reported to the State Election Commission to fix another date for holding election.

4. The Writ Petitioner has challenged this Notification dated 04.12.2025 on the following grounds:

(i) Tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top