IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AT AMARAVATI
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.
K. Suresh Babu - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department and others. - Respondents
Writ Petition No.34107 of 2025
Decided On : 10-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges election notification on grounds of timing and legal irregularities. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. election commission's authority is subject to judicial accountability. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. court upholds that indirect elections for mayor are permissible within statutory timeline. (Para 14 , 16) |
ORDER :
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.
Heard Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Ms. Jhansi Lakshmi, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader representing O/o Advocate General appearing for Respondent Nos.1 & 4 and Sri Vivek Chandrasekhar, Ld. Counsel for the State Election Commission appearing for the Respondent No.2.
2. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“It is therefore prayed, that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notification No.217/SEC-f1/2025, dated 04.12.2025 issued by the respondent No.2 directing the respondent No.3 to authorize the respondent No.4 for conduct of election of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation to fill up the Casual Vacancy occurred in the office of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation, eventhough, the ordinary election for all the members shall be conducted on or before February, 2026 as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, quite contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
SUBMISSIONS OF THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE WRIT PETITIONER:
3. It is submitted by the Ld. Senior Counsel for the Writ Petitioner that the Writ Petitioner was a former Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation; that the Writ Petitioner was elected as a Mayor of the Kadapa Municipal Corporation on 18.03.2021 for a term of five years; that in the normal course, the term of the Writ Petitioner as Mayor would end by 17.03.2026; whereas, the Writ Petitioner had suffered disqualification and was removed from the Mayorship vide G.O.Rt.No.1016, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (G) Department, dated 23.09.2025 (Ex.P.3); that the said removal was on account of alleged irregularities committed by the Writ Petitioner during execution of the Civil Contract Works within the jurisdiction of Kadapa Municipal Corporation through the firm M/s. Vardhini Constructions (which is owned by his immediate family members); that the Writ Petitioner has challenged the G.O.Rt.No.1016, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (G) Department, dated 23.09.2025 (Ex.P.3) in W.P.No.26724 of 2025 and the same is pending on the file of this Hon'ble Court; that in the meantime, the Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission (Respondent No.2) had issued Notification No.217/SEC-F1/2025, dated 04.12.2025 (Ex.P.1) for filling-up of the casual vacancy i.e., Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation which has occurred on account of disqualification of the Writ Petitioner herein; that the Annexure to the Notification dated 04.12.2025 would indicate that the Notice would be given in Form-II by the District Collector or the Joint Collector of Y.S.R.Kadapa District on or before 07.12.2025 and the Special Meeting for conduct of election of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation would be held at 11 AM on 11.12.2025, and that the 'Note' therein would stipulate that if for any reason election to the Office of Mayor of Kadapa Municipal Corporation is not held on 11.12.2025, it shall be held on the next date and even on the said date if the Mayor could not be elected, the matter shall be reported to the State Election Commission to fix another date for holding election.
4. The Writ Petitioner has challenged this Notification dated 04.12.2025 on the following grounds:
(i) Tha
The court determined that indirect elections for Mayor can proceed despite the short duration remaining in the current term, affirming distinct treatment from direct elections subject to statutory re....
Elections for a casual vacancy in a municipal council must be held within statutory timelines, and if less than six months remain in the council's term, the vacancy should not be filled.
Non-conduct of municipal elections for over seven years constitutes a violation of constitutional duties and governance principles, warranting a writ of mandamus to uphold democratic processes.
The tenure of elected municipal councillors is strictly five years as per constitutional mandate, with no provisions for extensions despite interruptions caused by administration appointments.
When statutory provisions create ambiguity regarding the commencement of limitation for election petitions, courts must apply the principle of harmonious construction to ensure that the right to chal....
The principle of rotation as mandated by Section 10(1-A) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (the Act) and the Rules made thereunder.
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Rule 8(7)(a) of the Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1995, which mandates drawing lots and decla....
Rules of game cannot be altered after the commencement of the game and the said moral obligation is applicable to the respondent-State also.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.