SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1227

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B S BHANUMATHI
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sahajeevan Babu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Agastya Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

B.S. BHANUMATHI, J.

M.A.C.M.A.No.1503 of 2005 is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award and the decree, dated 07.04.2005, in M.V.O.P.No.105 of 2002 before the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Madanapalle.

M.A.C.M.A.No.1518 of 2005 is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award and the decree, dated 07.04.2005, in M.V.O.P.No.103 of 2002 before the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Madanapalle.

2. The appellant herein is the 2nd respondent / insurance company. The respondent No.1 is the claimant before the Tribunal. The 2nd respondent is the owner of the jeep bearing No.KA 19 6429.

a. In M.A.C.M.A.No.1503 of 2005, notice sent to the respondent No.1 / claimant was not returned though it was sent to the same address as given before the Tribunal. In M.A.C.M.A.No.1518 of 2005, in spite of service of notice on the respondent No.1 / claimant, there has been no appearance.

b. The appeal against the 2nd respondent was dismissed for default vide order, dated 03.01.2012, of this Court.

3. The case of the claimant, in brief, is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top