Back
MADAN GOPAL VYAS
United India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sanju Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case and compensation awarded. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against the liability of the insurance company. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's consideration of presented evidence and insurance policy details. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal doctrine on liability coverage of 'act only policy' in insurance. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusion reversing liability of the insurance company. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
Madan Gopal Vyas, J.
The appellant-Insurance Company has filed the present civil miscellaneous appeal under section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 against judgment and award dated 23.04.2009 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Parbatsar (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) in Claim Case no. 12/2007, whereby, the learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 3,47,400/- as compensation to the claimants on account of death of Rameshwar along with interest and has held the appellant-Insurance Company alongwith the owner and driver of the vehicle jointly and severally liable for payment of compensation.
2. The facts in a nutshell giving rise to the present appeal are that on 23.11.2006, the deceased Rameshwar and Bhagu Ram
Liability of the insurance company under an 'act only policy' does not cover the risk of the occupants of the vehicle.
The main legal point established is that under an 'act only policy', the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation for passengers traveling in a vehicle, as interpreted from the Motor Vehic....
An insurance policy labeled as 'Private Car Liability Only' does not cover occupants unless a premium is charged for their risk, thus limiting the insurer's liability.
An 'Act Only' insurance policy does not cover passengers unless additional premium is paid, exonerating the insurer from liability for compensation.
An 'Act policy' under the Motor Vehicles Act does not cover passenger liability unless explicitly stated; the insurance company cannot be held liable for injuries to unauthorized passengers.
Insurance companies are not liable for compensation if passengers are not covered by the policy terms, specifically under Act policy provisions.
Occupants of a private car are not covered by an Act Only Policy, and therefore, the insurance company cannot be held liable to pay compensation for the occupants' claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
