IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B Krishna Mohan, J.
V.Chenakesavulu, S/O. Late Chinna Narappa And Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State Of A P, Rep. By Its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department And Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No : 24525 of 2022
Decided On : 11-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the unilateral order without notice. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding expired section 145 proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observations about proceedings and access rights. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ petition disposed of; orders vacated. (Para 8) |
ORDER :
B Krishna Mohan, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondent.
2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in his capacity as Mandal Executive Magistrate, Puttaparthy passing orders vide proceedings No.MC.No.72/2022-C dated 28.07.2022 in respect of the land in Sy.No.1 to an extent of Ac.0.50 cents out of Ac.683.56 (Konda) without taking into consideration of the long possession of the petitioners for the last 20 years and passed the orders unilaterally without issuing any prior notice.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the Section 145 Cr.P.C. proceedings issued by the 4th respondent dated 28.07.2022 restraining the petitioners and the 5th respondent from entering upon a disputed land in Sy.No.1 to an extent of Ac.0.50 cents out of Ac.683.56 cents (Konda) of Vengalammacheruvu village of Puttaparthy Mandal until further orders to avoid law and order problems was already expired by 27.01.2023 as six months period has been lapsed. Thereafter, there is no extension of the same. However, he contends that under the guise of the above said Cr.P.C. proceedings, the petitioners are prevented from entering into their land in an extent of Ac.2.70 cents in Sy.No.13 situated at Vengalammacheruvu village of Puttaparthy Mandal and as such the petitioners are being deprived of their legal operations at the instance of the 5th respondent in collusion with the local revenue officials.
4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 03.12.2025 submits that, as per RSR of Vengalammacheruvu village, Puttaparthy Mandal, the land in Sy.No.1 in an extent of Ac.1810.31 cents is classified as GU Konda. Out of Ac.1810.31 cents at present Ac.683.56 cents is available and earmarked as Konda in adangal. The then Sub Inspector of Police, Puttaparthi Rural Police Station has informed through letter dated 21.07.2022 that the petitioners are having Ac.2.70 cents of land in Sy.No.13 in Vengalammacheruvu village fields and the said land is situated beside the check dam. There is a government land situated by the side of the petitioners’ land. Hence, every year some part of the government land was cleaned and in total about Ac.0.50 cents of land was occupied by the petitioners which is not assigned and the petitioners raised crops in the said land. The 5th respondent aged about 68 years who is none other than the elder brother of the 1st petitioner tried to occupy the said land with highhanded behavior. Apprehending the serious law and order problem, the then Sub-Inspector of Police requested the 4th respondent to initiate Section 145 Cr.P.C. proceedings and accordingly, the same was issued by the MC.No.72/2022-C, dated 28.07.2022 restraining both the parties that the petitioners and the 5th respondent from entering into the disputed land in an extent of Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.1 out of Ac.683.56 (Konda) of Vengalammacheruvu village, Puttaparthi Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District until further orders to avoid law and order problems.
5. Be that as it may, Ms. Botta Aruna, learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondent relying upon the counter of the 5th respondent submits that, the 5th respondent is already having land in Sy.No.920, 921/2 and 919/2 in total to an extent Ac.4.42 cents and there is no need for the 5th respondent to enter or create dispute with reference to the government land as contended by the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the above said instructions of the 4th respondent dated 03.12.2025
Court ruled that expired proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. invalidate restrictions on land access, allowing petitioners to seek remedies for land disputes.
Proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C cannot proceed when a civil suit regarding the same property is pending, as the civil court has the authority to determine title and possession.
The ingredients necessary for passing an order under Section 145 (1) of the Code would not automatically attract for the attachment of the property. Under Section 146, a Magistrate has to satisfy him....
When dispute with regard to same subject property is pending in a civil court, parallel proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. are not maintainable before Executive Magistrate.
The proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are intended to maintain public order and do not adjudicate property title, focusing instead on actual possession to prevent breach....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.