SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1280

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.SUJATHA
Pasupuleti Padma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Joseph

Table of Content
1. factual background regarding the petitioner’s appointment and allegations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of procedural actions leading to suspension and implications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court’s observations on procedural fairness and requirements for disciplinary actions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. judicial conclusions regarding the right to fair procedure and orders of the court. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

ORDER :

“…to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing Proceedings in RC No.786/2025-C, dated 31.07.2025 placing my authorization on Fair Price Shop No.0750019 in Kuretivaripalem H/o Allavaripalem Village, Cherukupalli Mandal, under interim suspension without considering my detailed explanation dated 22.07.2025, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently to set aside the said order dated 31.07.2025 of the 4th respondent in the interest of justice and to pass…”

2.1 While the matter being so, on 10.07.2025 at about 1:00 a.m. the police officials of Cherukupalli Police Station came to the petitioner’s house, knocked the door and has enquired

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top