SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1273

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.SUJATHA
B. Vijaya Kumar S/o Pompathi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kale Vijaya Raju

Table of Content
1. suspension without enquiry leads to arbitrary action. (Para 2)
2. arguments presented regarding the suspension's legality. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's observations on timely enquiry. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's final ruling on revocation of suspension. (Para 8)

ORDER :

“..to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India declaring the order of the 4th respondent dated 13.05.2025 vide Rc.(M).1206/2025 by suspended the authorization of F.P. Shop No.1381001 of Yemmiganur Town and Mandal, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural Justice and violation of articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially set aside the above orders passed by the respondents 3 and 4 and direct the respondents to permit the Petitioner to run the F.P. Shop No.1381001 of the Yemmiganur Town and Mandal, Kurnool District by supplying essential commodities and pass such other order or orders…”

a. The petitioner was initially appointed as a fair price shop dealer for shop No.1381001 at Yammiganur Town and Mandal, Kurnool District, in the year 2007. As the petitioner was s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top