SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(AP) 181

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y.LAKSHMANA RAO
Alladi Punna Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.R. Sudhakar

Table of Content
1. filing of multiple firs for same incident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments against multiple firs for similar transactions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. government's defense and maintenance of distinct firs. (Para 7 , 8)
4. court's observations on procedural error in multiple firs. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. transfer of cases for unified investigation. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

ORDER :

1. The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue any vmt or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in registering multiple firs with regard to the same incident and registering FIR.No.166 of 2025 dt. 22.04.2025 on the file of Duwada Police Station Visakhapatnam and FIR No.85 of 2025 dt.01.05.2025 on the file of Dwaraka Police Station Visakhapatnam as illegal arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 20 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash the FIRs against the petitioner including FIR No.166 of 2025 dt.22.04.2025 on the file of Duwada Police Station Visakhapatnam and transfer all other complaints against Sneha Mutually Aided Cooperative Society Ltd SNEH

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top