IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
South Central Railway – Appellant
Versus
Rayudu China Venkata Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
1. This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is filed aggrieved against the judgment and decree, dated 12.09.2011, in A.S.No.22 of 2008, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 31.01.2008, in O.S.No.940 of 2005, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovvur.
2. The plaintiff initiated action in O.S.No.940 of 2005, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovvur, with a prayer for declaration that the plaintiff is the adopted son of Rayudu Veerraju and his wife Somamma and for costs of the suit.
3. The learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovvur, dismissed the suit without costs. Felt aggrieved of the same, the unsuccessful plaintiff in the above said suit filed the first appeal before the First Appellate Court. The learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur, allowed the appeal without costs by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Judge. Aggrieved thereby, the appellants/defendant Nos.1 to 3 approached this Court by way of second appeal.
4. The appellants herein are the defendant Nos.1 to 3, the respondent No.1 herein i
The burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish valid adoption as per statutory requirements; registered deeds are rebuttable and do not eliminate the need for actual proof.
The validity of adoption requires clear, cogent evidence of factum, including actual giving and taking; mere documentation is insufficient without proof of the legal requirements.
The validity of an adoption must establish consent of both natural parents, failing which the adoption may be considered invalid under Hindu law.
Point of law: Capacity of a male Hindu to take in adoption-Any male Hindu who is of sound mind and is not a minor has the capacity to take a son or a daughter in adoption. Provided that, if he has a ....
The validity of an adoption must be established by evidence of actual giving and taking of the child, with presumption favoring registered Adoption Deeds unless convincingly rebutted.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the adoption deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and the physical act of giving and taking of adoption did not take place in acc....
Point of law: A perfectly valid adoption deed can be made without an adoption deed and any status which the adopted son gets by virtue of adoption is due to the proper ceremonies being performed and ....
Registered adoption documents presume compliance with the law; the burden rests on the claimant to disprove, which may not simply rely on allegations of fraud.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.