Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Nagavamsam Vasudeva S/o Late Murali, Hindu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.
Since the issue involved and the petitioners herein are arrayed as Accused in Crime No.23 of 2026 of Tiruchanur Police Station Tirupathi, these Criminal Petitioners are being disposed of by this Common Order.
Criminal Petition No.1891 of 2026
2. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( for short ‘BNSS, 2023’), by the Petitioner/A.17 to enlarge him on bail in connection with Crime No.23 of 2026 of Tiruchanur Police Station, Tirupathi District, which is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 140(1), 126(2), 351(2) read with 190, 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
Criminal Petition No.1894 of 2026
3. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by the Petitioner/A.1 to enlarge him on bail in connection with Crime No.23 of 2026 of Tiruchanur Police Station, Tirupathi District, which is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 140(1), 126(2), 351(2) read with 190, 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
Criminal Petition No.1911 of 2026
4. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 480 and 483 of the B
Bail may be granted even in serious offences if the accused's fair trial rights are violated, and no compelling reason for continued incarceration exists.
The Court established that insufficient evidence justifies granting bail, especially when similar co-accused have been released.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
