SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1332

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI NATH TILHARI, MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, JJ.
Shaik Masthan Vali – Appellant
Versus
Kummaru Durga and Others – Respondents
Land Grabbing Appeal Nos. 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 31 of 2016, Land Grabbing Appeal Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 24, 25, 28, 30, 32 of 2017, Land Grabbing Appeal Nos. 1, 2 of 2024
Decided On : 28-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : T.N.M. Ranga Rao, Unnam Sravan Kumar
For the Respondents: Dammalapati Srinivas, S. Vivek Chandrasekhar, C. Venkaiah, Kalangi Manohar

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear Land Grabbing Appeals after the abolition of the Special Court; such appeals are not maintainable without a designated appellate forum as per the Act.

Headnote:(A) Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Section 7A - Maintainability of appeals - The High Court ruled that the appeals against orders of the Special Tribunal under the Act are not maintainable after the abolition of the Special Court by Government Order dated 02.09.2016. The right to appeal vests under the Act and cannot be exercised until a new forum is established, which has not been done. Therefore, the orders of the Special Tribunal are final and can only be subject to judicial review under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution. (Para 86-90)

(B) Judicial Review - The right to an appellate forum is not inherent; if the forum is abolished without a statutory alternative, the right perishes. (Para 35-43)

(C) Separation of powers - Executive cannot assume legislative powers to create a jurisdiction that was not conferred by the legislature. The High Court cannot serve as the appellate authority under the Act without appropriate legislative changes. (Para 70-86)

Facts of the case:
The appeals revolve around the maintainability of various Land Grabbing Appeals under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 post-abolition of the Special Court. Initial dismissals by the Special Tribunal prompted appeals, which were directed to transfer to the High Court.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the abolition of the Special Court meant the appeals were not maintainable in the High Court.

Issues: Primarily, whether Land Grabbing Appeals are maintainable in the High Court after the abolition of the Special Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The right to appeal is a statutory right, and after the Special Court's abolition, the High Court cannot serve as an appellate forum unless legislatively empowered to do so.

Result: All appeals dismissed as not maintainable.

Table of Content
1. maintainability of land grabbing appeals under act 1982. (Para 1 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments from counsel on appeal maintainability. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7)
3. analysis of statutory provisions under act 1982. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. general principles relating to rights and forums. (Para 28 , 32 , 33)
5. final determination on appeal maintainability and further actions. (Para 90 , 91 , 92)

JUDGMENT :

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.

1. The aforesaid batch of Land Grabbing Appeals involve common question as to their maintainability in this Court under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act 1982 (in short ‘the Act 1982’).

2. L.G.A.No.1 of 2024, in which also the same question is involved and was reserved separately is also being decided with this batch.

3. Heard Sri T.N.M. Ranga Rao, learned counsel for the appellants in LGA. No.9 of 2017. No other counsel appeared to advance the arguments for the appellants in batch of Appeals.

4. We also heard Sri Dammalapati Srinivas, learned Advocate General for the State respondent.

5. We provided by the Order dated 02.04.2025 that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh through Registrar General be also impleaded as party in one of the appeals, LGA No.20 of 2016, which shall be the leading case of the batch of appeals and such impleadment, only for the purpose of granting opportunity of hearing to the High Court in view of there being the resolution by the Administrative Committee of the then common High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana and for the State of Andhra Pradesh. As such the impleadment was made.

6. We also heard Sri S. Vivek Chandrasekhar, learned standing counsel for Andhra Pradesh High Court.

7. In LGA No.1 of 2024 – We heard Sri Unnam Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri C. Venkaiah, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri Kalangi Manohar, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

8. We would briefly refer to the facts of the aforesaid LGAs as follows:

I Facts:

i) LGA No.20 of 2016:

L.G.O.P.No.8 of 2009 under Section 7 -A(1) of the A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (in short ‘the Act 1982’), on the file of A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Tribunal (District Judge) at Guntur, was filed by the appellant/applicant for eviction of the respondents therein from the application schedule property and surrender vacant possession of the same to the applicant. The same was dismissed vide Order dated 25.07.2013. Challenging the said Order, L.G.A.No.11 of 2014 was filed under Section 7 -A (3) of the Act 1982 before the Special Court under Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 at B. R. K. R. Bhavan, Tankbund, Hyderabad. After abolition of the Special Court vide G.O.Ms.No.420 Revenue (EA & AR) Department, dated 02.09.2016, the L.G.A.No.11 of 2014 was transferred to the High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, where it was re-numbered as L.G.A.No.20 of 2016. After bifurcation of the State, as the matter related to the jurisdiction of the District Court, Guntur, it was transferred to this Court, maintaining the same number.

ii) LGA No.19 of 2016:

O.P.No.7 of 1994 under Section 7 (2) of the A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (in short ‘the Act 1982’), on the file of Special Tribunal constituted under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act (Principal District Judge) at Nellore, was filed by the respondents against the appellant for direction to the respondent/appellant to deliver the site and award compensation of Rs.5,000/- by way of damages. The same was allowed vide Order dated 18.11.2010. Challenging the said Order, L.G.A.No.3 of 2012 was filed under Section 7 -A (3) of the Act 1982 before the Special Court under Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad. After abolition of the Special Court vide G.O.Ms.No.420 Revenue (EA & AR) Department, dated 02.09.2016, the L.G.A.No.3 of 2012 was transferred to the High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, where it was re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top