K.RAMACHANDRIAH
MRUTHYUNJAYA – Appellant
Versus
PREMAJIT SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') involves for consideration the following point of law:"whether a complainant whose Revision petition filed under Section 397 of the code before the Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate dismissing his complaint is also dismissed by the sessions Judge cannot invoke the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under section 482 of the Code for setting aside the orders of the Magistrate and the sessions Judge?"
( 2 ) THE said point arises in this way: (a) Petitioner as proprietor of M/s. Raja silk House (Pvt.) Ltd. , Basavaraja Market, bangalore, filed a private complaint against the respondents in the Court of the Chief metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore City, under Section 190 read with Section 200 of the Code alleging that the respondents had committed offences punishable under Sections 477-A, 420 and 409 IPC. Respondents- 1 and 2 are the Chairman and General manager of the Bank of Baroda at Bombay and respondents 3 to 5 are the Senior manager, Accounts officer and another senior Manager of the Bank of Baroda branch, K. G. Road, Bangalore
FOLLOWED ON : Madhu Limaye v State of Maharashtra
REFERRED TO : Amarnath v State of Haryana
FOLLOWED ON : Municipal Corporation v Ram Kishan Rohtgi
REFERRED TO : Arun Kumar Bose v Ansari
Rajan Kumar Machananda v State of Karnataka
S.H.N. Baksh v State of Karnataka
FOLLOWED ON : In Re: Puritipati Jagga Reddy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.