P.VISHWANATHA SHETTY, H.G.RAMESH
BALAJI COMPUTERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellants in this appeal were the petitioners in writ petitions No. 5158-61 of 2005. The substantial grievance of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessees') in the writ petitions was that since the parts of Computer and Computer peripherals were exempted from levy of Turnover Tax/resale Tax (hereinafter referred to as 'the TOT/rst) under Section 6b of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), by means of Notification no. FD 48 CSL 2000 (2) dated 18"' July 2000; No. FD 97 CSL 2001 (7) No. 660 dated 31st march 2001 and No. FD 54 CSL 2002 (4) dated 30"' March 2002, the copies of which have been produced as Annexures-E, F and G respectively to this appeal, the proposition notices issued by the Assessing Authorities pursuant to the Circular dated 31st December 2004 in No. CLR CR. 157/04-05, a copy of which has been produced as Annexure-D to the writ petitions, were without jurisdiction and were liable to be quashed. They have also sought for quashing of the aforesaid circular, Annexure-D. The learned single Judge, by means of his Order dated 10th February 2005 dismissed the writ petitions on the short
Bhopal Sugar Industrial Limited, M.P. v. D.P. Dube, Sales Tax Officer, Bhopal
Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Galada Continuous Castings Ltd.
CCE v. Dhiren Chemical Industries
Arif Transport v. Commercial Tax Officer
PRESTIGE ENGINEERING INDIA LIMITED Vs COLLECTOR OF central EXCISE, MEERUT
COLLECTOR OF central EXCISE,BOMBAY Vs JAYANT DALAL PRIVATE Limited
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED Vs COLLECTOR OF central EXCISE, BOLPUR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.