The plaintiffs have preferred this writ petition challenging the order passed by the trial Court allowing I.A. No. 7-an application filed by the 1st defendant under Section 11(2) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 (for short hereinafter referred to as ' the Act) and directing the plaintiffs to value the suit property in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act and pay the requisite Court fee before proceeding further in the matter.

2. The plaintiffs filed O.S.No.166/2006 on the file of the II Civil Judge at Mysore for declaration that the palupatti dated 8.7.1973 is a forged, concocted and invalid document and that it does not relate to or refer to or apply to the suit schedule item Nos. 1 and 2 and for a mandatory injunction directing defendant Nos. 2 and 3 “the Executive Officer, Mysore Taluk Panchayath and the Secretary, Naganahally Grama Panchayath to reverse, annul and cancel the khatha entries made in respect of suit schedule item Nos. 1 and 2 on the basis of the concocted palupatti dated 8.7.1973 and to enter the name of the 1st plaintiff in the Khata pertaining to the said items.

3. The case of the plaintiffs is that the 2nd plaintiff