Ashok B. Hinchigeri, J.

The petitioner has called into question the order, dated 14.03.2006 (Annexure-A) passed by the second respondent/Assistant Commissioner taking up the Appeal No. 67/2015-16 for reconsideration based on the representation and application of the respondent No. 4.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that the Tahasildar effected M.R.No. 23/1997-98 in respect of the land measuring 30 guntas at Sy.No. 98/11 of Rayasandra Village. By the said M.R., the mutation entry and the khatha were effected in favour of the respondent No. 4. The petitioner challenged the said M.R. by way of appeal in 2015 invoking Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'KLR Act'). On finding that the respondent No. 4 had not purchased the land standing at Sy.No. 98/11, the Assistant Commissioner set-aside the said entry and directed the restoration of the entries, as they stood prior to the said M.R. This was done on 19.12.2015. The respondent No.4 submitted a representation on 06.01.2016 (wrongly shown as 06.01.2015). The said representation was for reconsideration and the recalling of the order, dated 19.12.2015. On the representation, the Assistant Commissio