G.NARENDAR
Anupama Hegde @ Anupama Bhat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.Narendar, J. - Heard Sri.Aruna Shyam.M, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt.K.P.Yashodha, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 State and Sri.H.S.Vivekananda, learned counsel for respondent No.3 in W.P.No.2961/2019 and respondent No.2 in Crl.P.No.2822/2016.
2. The facts in brief are that one Smt.Vishalakshi Bhat, who is arrayed as accused No.1 in C.C.No.7358/2016 pending on the file of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, was employed as the Branch Manger of HDFC Life Insurance, BTM Layout Branch, Bengaluru. That, between the years 2013 to 2015, the said accused is alleged to have induced several persons to invest in certain schemes allegedly launched and run by the HDFC Company. That one such Scheme was called 'Employee Benefit Scheme' and it is alleged that she represented to several people that if money is invested in her name with the Bank as per the Scheme, higher rates of interest will be paid by the Bank for deposits by the employees and stating so, she is said to have convinced numerous complainants to transfer money to her account or to hand-over money to her by promising them that she would invest it in the deposit s
Arun Bhandari vs. State of U.P.
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma vs. State of Bihar
Jaswantrai Manilal Akhaney vs. State of Bombay
Mahadeo Prasad vs. State of W.B.
Manik Taneja and Another vs. State of Karnataka and Another
S.W. Palanitkar vs. State of Bihar
Samir Sahay vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal
State of Kerala vs. A. Pareed Pillai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.