M.NAGAPRASANNA
Bangalore Turf Club Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Represented by The Principal Secretary Finance Department – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioners in these writ petitions inter alia challenge the legislative intent of making the petitioners liable to pay Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’ for short) on the entire bet amount received by the totalisator and declare the amendments dated 25-01-2018 which inserted Rule 31A(3) to the CGST Rules as being ultra vires the CGST Act.
2. Adumbrated in brief, the factual background as projected by the petitioners are as follows :
The petitioners, are Companies incorporated under the Companies Act as a Public Limited Company are carrying on the business of a race club, which includes lay-out and preparing any land for running of horse races, steeplechases of races of any other kind and for any kind of athletic sports. The petitioners particularly conduct horse racing and facilitates betting by the punters. The petitioners by themselves do not bet, but only facilitates punters in their betting activity. It is the punter who places the bet either with a totalisator run by the petitioners or a book-maker licensed by the petitioners.
3. If a horse backed by the punter wins,
Mathuram Aggarwal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Rajasthan v. Rajasthan Chemists Association
Dr. K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of T.N. and Another
Sunrise Associates v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Union of India v. Sri Sarada Mills Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.