SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 572

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALOK ARADHE, HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, JJ.
N. Ramaraju - Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Karnataka - Respondent
W.A. No. 17016 of 2011, 16566 of 2011, 23 of 2012, 504 of 2012, 2514 of 2013, 2941 of 2013, 4317 of 2013, 5630 of 2013; W.P. No. 16289 of 2008, 16290 of 2008, 16291 of 2008, 16292 of 2008, 16293 of 2008, 16294 of 2008, 16295 of 2008, 16296 of 2008, 16297 of 2008, 16298 of 2008, 15607 of 2008, 15608 of 2008, 15609 of 2008, 15610 of 2008, 15611 of 2008, 16238 of 2009, 17107 of 2009, 17108 of 2009, 17109 of 2009, 17110 of 2009, 1999 of 2010, 2000 of 2010, 2001 of 2010, 2002 of 2010, 2004 of 2010, 2005 of 2010, 2006 of 2010, 2007 of 2010, 2008 of 2010, 2009 of 2010, 2010 of 2010, 2011 of 2010, 2012 of 2010, 2013 of 2010, 2014 of 2010, 2015 of 2010, 2016 of 2010, 2017 of 2010, 2018 of 2010, 2019 of 2010, 2020 of 2010, 2021 of 2010, 2022 of 2010, 2023 of 2010, 2024 of 2010, 2025 of 2010, 2026 of 2010, 2027 of 2010, 2028 of 2010, 2029 of 2010, 2030 of 2010, 2031 of 2010, 2032 of 2010, 16797 of 2011, 3292 of 2012, 2976 of 2011, 2977 of 2011, 2978 of 2011, 2979 of 2011, 2980 of 2011
Decided on : 02-08-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
G.S. Balagangadhar, Advocate, Shivaprabhu S Hiremath, Advocate, G. Krishnamurthy, Advocate, R.V. Jayaprakash, Advocate, Udaya Holla, Advocate, K.S. Chandrahasa, Advocate, G.B. Eswarappa, Advocate, B.N. Prakash, Advocate, Madhu Naik, Advocate, Badri Vishal, Advocate, Janardhana G, Advocate, Ashok Haranahalli, Advocate, Venkatesh P Dalawai, Advocate, Srikante Gowda, Advocate, Varadarajan M S, Advocate, Reuben Jacob, Advocate, R.P. Somashekaraiah, Advocate, Manjunatha B R, Advocate

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Land Acquisition (Mysore Extension Amendment) Act, 1961 - Acquisition of Land - Possession of land - Appellants claim to be owners and in possession of agricultural land. Respondent No.4 namely National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI) Housing Co-operative Society Ltd. (Society), submitted a representation to the Government for acquisition of 66 acres and 5 guntas of land for formation of a residential layout for its members - Commissioner Revenue conveyed sanction of the government to acquire 171 acres and 37 guntas of land i.e., much in excess of land in respect of which acquisition was sought by the Society. It is the case of the appellants that extent of land mentioned in the aforesaid communication was fraudulently changed to 177 acres and 37 guntas. Commissioner Revenue by a communication - preliminary Notification was issued under Section 4(1) of Act proposing to acquire 322 acres of land for the Society - name of Society was changed to National Technological Institution Employees Housing Co-operative Society Limited, after obtaining approval from the competent authority. The norms pertaining to membership of the society were also changed – Held, Appellant in W.A. that learned Single Judge ought to have dealt with the interlocutory application filed for seeking the relief of restoration of status quo ante. It is pertinent to note that learned Single Judge has held that challenge to acquisition proceedings suffers from delay and laches and therefore, the writ petitions were dismissed in limine. Therefore, it was not necessary for learned Single Judge to pass an order on interlocutory application. In any case, the pending interlocutory application does not survive after decision of the writ petition. As far as I.A. filed by appellant in W.A. is concerned, in which prayer has been sought for quashing of the land acquisition proceeding on the ground that the same have lapsed under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act, same also deserves to be dismissed for the reasons assigned by us while dealing with issue No.V. It is made clear that land bearing Sy.No.69/7 situated at Village to extent of 14 guntas is not subject matter of these appeals – Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Aradhe J.

In these intra court appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, the appellants/land owners have assailed the validity of the orders dated 04/05.07.2011 and 06.03.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge, by which writ petitions preferred by the appellants seeking quashment of notifications dated 04.01.1985 and 25.09.1986 issued under Section 4(1) and under Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) respectively and award dated 31.01.1989 as well as notifications dated 12/15.04.1991 and 4/5.11.1992 issued under Section 16(2) of the Act, have been dismissed. In order to appreciate the appellants' grievance, few facts need mention, which are stated infra.

2. The appellants claim to be the owners and in possession of agricultural land situated at Kothihosahalli, Kodigehalli, and Bytarayanapura Villages, Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru. The respondent No.4 namely National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI) Housing Co-operative Society Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the Society' for short), submitted a representation to the Government for acquisition of 66 acres and 5 guntas of land situate at Kothihosahalli, Kodigehalli and Byatarayanapura Villages for formation of a residential layout for its members. The Commissioner Revenue conveyed sanction of the government to acquire 171 acres and 37 guntas of land i.e., much in excess of the land in respect of which the acquisition was sought by the Society. It is the case of the appellants that extent of land mentioned in the aforesaid communication was fraudulently changed to 177 acres and 37 guntas. The Commissioner Revenue by a communication dated 15.12.1984 requested the special Deputy Commissioner to issue a Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act in respect of 280 acres of land. Thereafter, a preliminary Notification dated 04.01.1985 was issued under Section 4(1) of the Act proposing to acquire 322 acres of land for the Society, which included the land of the appellants. On 22.08.1986, the name of the Society was changed to National Technological Institution Employees Housing Co-operative Society Limited, after obtaining approval from the competent authority. The norms pertaining to membership of the society were also changed. Thereupon the membership of the society was extended to employees of the bank and employees to State Government and others. Thereafter, a declaration under Section 6(1) of the Act was issued on 22.09.1986 in respect of land measuring 210 acres and 37 guntas.

3. The Deputy Commissioner by a communication dated 16.10.1986 requested the Registrar of Co- operative Societies to place the matter pertaining to acquisition of land in question before a three men Committee constituted to scrutinize the land acquisition proceeding. The three men Committee, after conducting an enquiry under Section 64 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, submitted a report dated 07.11.1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the GVK Rao report' for short) and placed the Society under the category of the Societies, which had indulged in serious irregularities. It was found in the enquiry that Society collected site deposits to the tune of Rs.2.71 crores and entered into an agreements with two agents namely M/s. Vellalu Constructions and Sri.Surya Rao and Co. and paid a sum of Rs.3.57 Crores to M/s.Vellalu Constructions. It was further found that the Society had illegally admitted large number of members from one organization. Thus, it was held that the Society had indulged in serious irregularities.

4. The State Government, on 28.01.1989, granted approval for acquisition of 184.04 acres of land in respect of 184.04. acres in favour of the Society under Section 11(1) of the Act (as modified by Land Acquisition (Mysore Extension Amendment) Act, 1961. Thereafter, a general award in respect of 68 a

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top