B.VEERAPPA, RAVI V.HOSMANI
K. U. POVAIAH – Appellant
Versus
K. NAMITHA POVAIAH – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B. Veerappa J.
1. The Appellant and First Respondent in RFA No. 1910/2013 filed compromise petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC, which reads as under:
(a) The Appellant and First Respondent are the co-owners in respect of the Suit Schedule Property having 50% right, title and interest in the same. The Suit Schedule Property is detailed hereunder in Schedule A for ready reference and is hereinafter referred to as "Schedule A Property"
(b) It is agreed between the parties that the 50% share of the Appellant in the Schedule A property is divided and demarcated by metes and bounds and is more fully detailed hereunder in Schedule B and is hereinafter referred to as "Schedule B Property".
(c) It is agreed between the parties that the 50% share, right, title and interest in Schedule A property of Respondent No. 1 is divided and demarcated by metes and bounds and is more
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.