Back
H.P.SANDESH
Syed Khaleed – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in the event of their arrest in respect of Crime No. 85/2022 registered by K.R. Pet Rural Police Station, Mandya, for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 324, 498-A and 313 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that the marriage of the complainant was solemnized with her husband i.e., accused No. 1 on 25.11.2021 at Holenarasipura Town and thereafter, she has joined the matrimonial home. It is an allegation that, all the family members demanded Rs. 2 lakhs stating that they have not given the cash of Rs. 2 lakhs and they cannot simply provide food and told her to leave the house and the husband of the complainant also burnt her with cigarette on her right leg. It is also her claim that she was also pregnant and her husband, mother-in-law, father-in-law and sister-in-law administered tablet for termination of pregnancy and her husband also assau
The court considered the severity of the offences, the delay in lodging the complaint, and the nature of the allegations in granting bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the timing of the complaint, the nature of the allegations, and the need for further investigation are crucial factors in determining the gran....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the gravity of the offence, the nature of injuries, and the pending dispute, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in bail deci....
The court's decision was influenced by the gravity of the offence and the fact that the offences were not punishable with death or imprisonment for life.
Bail is a rule and rejection is an exception, and the specific circumstances of the case must be considered when granting or rejecting bail in non-bailable offences.
The court considered the specific allegation and medical opinion in determining the appropriateness of granting bail to the petitioner.
The court allows bail to the petitioner under specified conditions, emphasizing that prior criminal history and misrepresentation of petition claims may lead to bail cancellation.
The court emphasized the importance of following the prescribed procedure and guidelines in cases involving allegations of harassment for dowry and directed the police to do so.
The court applied the principle laid down in arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar case, emphasizing the need to follow the procedure under Section 41-a of Cr.P.C for offences punishable with less than seve....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
