IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P. Sandesh, J.
MOHAMMAD SINAN – Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 4670 of 2022
Decided On : 20-06-2022
Bail - Offences under Ss. 498A, 313, 323 read with 34 of IPC and Sec. 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act - Enlargement of petitioner on bail with conditions
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking bail in connection with a case registered for offences under Ss. 498A, 313, 323 read with 34 of IPC and Sec. 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complainant alleged that the petitioner and other accused persons subjected her to assault, resulting in abortion.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the specific allegation against the petitioner and the final opinion given by the doctor, which attributed the miscarriage to trauma and severe mental stress. The court concluded that it was appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail with conditions to cooperate with the Investigating Officer for further investigation.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail in connection with the alleged offences.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the specific allegation against the petitioner and the medical opinion attributing the miscarriage to trauma and severe mental stress.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail with specified conditions to cooperate with the Investigating Officer and not to leave the jurisdiction without prior permission.
JUDGMENT :
H.P. Sandesh, J.
1. This petition is filed under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C. praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in respect of Crime No. 24/2022 registered by Bantwala Rural Police Station, D.K., for the offences punishable under Ss. 498A, 313, 323 read with 34 of IPC and Sec. 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that the marriage of the complainant was solemnized with her husband on 1/8/2021 and thereafter she has joined the matrimonial home. The husband left the country in the month of October 2021 and this petitioner and other accused persons insisted her to get the gold ornaments as additional dowry. That in the month of January 2022, there was marriage of her sisterin-law and the husband came to India on 4/1/2022 and thereafter he returned on 24/1/2022. That on 25/1/2022, she went to her parental house since she was pregnant. They insisted her to keep all the gold ornaments in the house. She had visited the house on 10/3/2022 and one gold ornament was given to repair on 20/1/2022 and mother-in-law called her and informed that the petitioner had brought the same. On 11/3/2022, when she asked the mother-in-law to show the same and insisted her to get all the gold ornaments, which she took, she was subjected to assault with their hands and this petitioner fisted on her abdomen and all of them have closed her mouth and neighbour came and pacified the incident, which resulted in abortion on 20/3/2022 and hence she filed the complaint. Based on the complaint, the police have registered the case for the offences under Ss. 498A, 313, 323 read with Sec. 34 of IPC and Sec. 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar allegation is made against all the accused persons and other accused persons have already been enlarged on bail except this petitioner. The only allegation against this petitioner is that he fisted on the abdomen of the complainant, which led to abortion. The husband of the complainant is staying at Saudi and this petitioner is ready to cooperate with the Investigating Officer for further investigation.
5. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State submits that this petitioner only fisted on her abdomen of the complainant, which has resulted in miscarriage and the doctor has opined that there is a possibility of miscarriage due to trauma and also possibility of patient undergoing miscarriage due to severe mental stress and hence there are sufficient material against the petitioner.
6. Having heard the respective learned counsel and also on perusal of the material available on record, specific allegation is made against this petitioner that he had fisted on the abdomen of the complainant, which resulted in miscarriage and he is the brother-in-law of the complainant. The final opinion given by the doctor for miscarriage is due to above mentioned trauma and also possibility of the patient undergoing miscarriage due to severe mental stress. When such opinion is given by the doctor, it is appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail with conditions to cooperate with the Investigating Officer for further investigation in the matter.
7. In view of the discussions made above, I pass the following:
ORDER:
(i) The petitioner shall surrender himself before the Investigating Officer within ten days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and shall execute a persona
The court considered the specific allegation and medical opinion in determining the appropriateness of granting bail to the petitioner.
The court considered the severity of the offences, the delay in lodging the complaint, and the nature of the allegations in granting bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the gravity of the offence, the nature of injuries, and the pending dispute, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in bail deci....
The court's decision was influenced by the gravity of the offence and the fact that the offences were not punishable with death or imprisonment for life.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the timing of the complaint, the nature of the allegations, and the need for further investigation are crucial factors in determining the gran....
Bail is a rule and rejection is an exception, and the specific circumstances of the case must be considered when granting or rejecting bail in non-bailable offences.
The severity of the accusations, specific and direct allegations of cruelty and harassment, and potential punishment are key factors in determining bail eligibility in cases involving serious offence....
The main legal point established is that bail can be granted based on the nature of the offence, the stage of trial, and the principles laid down in court pronouncements, even without commenting on t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.