SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 442

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K.SOMASHEKAR, C.M.JOSHI, JJ.
State Of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Prashanth @ Prashantha Raj Urs S/O Javaraja Urs – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No.1091 of 2016
Decided on : 14-11-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri Abhijit K.S., HCGP
For the Respondent:Sri. P.P. Hegde, for Sri. Venkatesh Somareddi, Advocate

Point of Law : Prosecution has failed to prove the guilt against the accused. [Para 39]

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498-A, 306, 304-B read with 34 - Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4 – Offence of harassment and cruelty to women - Dowry death - Common intention – Charged - Accused No.1 is husband - Her marriage was performed with accused No.1 as per customs prevailing in their society - Accused Nos.2 to 4 being mother, father and sister’s daughter of accused No.1 respectively, in furtherance of their common intention, since sometime after the marriage, were subjecting to cruelty by harassing her and also ill-treating her physically and mentally, as it likely to drive her to commit suicide - In furtherance of their common intention and in course of same transaction, received cash of Rs.35,000/-and gold ornaments weighing 35 grams in all as dowry from the parents of deceased - Despite receiving dowry in terms of cash and gold items from parents of deceased, accused had extended physical as well as mental harassment, driving deceased to commit suicide.

Finding of Court : On carefully going through the evidence of the prosecution and on close scrutiny of the ingredients of each count of offences under section 498-A of IPC, 1860 relating to physical and mental harassment, under section 306 of IPC, 1860 relating to abetment of suicide and even section 304-B of IPC, 1860 relating to causing death of the deceased within a span of seven years from date of marriage, even though prosecution has let in evidence by subjecting to examination all witnesses which are stated supra, prosecution has failed to prove guilt against accused that accused alone had abetted for causing death of deceased who committed suicide, as narrated in theory of prosecution - In totality of evidence of prosecution and also on re-appreciation of evidence and so also revisiting the impugned judgment of acquittal rendered by trial Court, Court are of opinion that there is no perversity, absurdity or illegality committed by trial Court in arriving at conclusion and rendering acquittal judgment and same does not call for interference in this appeal - For aforesaid reasons and findings, Court are of considered opinion that prosecution has failed to prove the guilt against accused. [Para 38 and 39]

Result : Appeal is hereby rejected.

JUDGMENT :

This appeal is directed against the judgment of acquittal rendered by the Court of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in S.C.No.19/2014 dated 13.01.2016 acquitting the accused of the offences punishable under sections 498-A, 306, 304-B read with section 34 of IPC, 1860 and under sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Whereas in this appeal, the appellant/State is seeking intervention of this Court to consider the grounds urged in the appeal and consequently, set aside the acquittal judgment rendered by the trial Court and convict the respondents/accused for the offences alleged against them.

2. Heard learned HCGP Shri Abhijith.K.S. for the appellant/State and so also learned Senior Counsel Shri P.P.Hegde for learned counsel Shri Venkatesh Somareddi who is on record for respondents/accused Nos.1, 2 and 4. So far as the case against respondent No.3/accused No.3 is abated in pursuance of order dated 15.07.2021 in view of the death of accused No.3 during the course of this appeal. Perused the impugned judgment of acquittal rendered by the trial Court in S.C.No.19/2014 dated 13.01.2016.

3. The factual matrix of this appeal are as under:-

It has transpired in the case of the prosecution that, accused No.1 is the husband of Smt.Pushpa @ Pushpalatha. Her marriage was performed with accused No.1 on 12.02.2009 as per the customs prevailing in their society. Accused Nos.2 to 4 being the mother, father and sister’s daughter of accused No.1 respectively, in furtherance oftheir common intention, since sometime after the marriage, were subjecting Smt. Pushpa @ Pushpalatha to cruelty by harassing her and also ill-treating her physically and mentally, as it likely to drive her to commit suicide. In furtherance of their common intention and in the course of the same transaction, received cash of Rs.35,000/-and gold ornaments weighing 35 grams in all as dowry from the parents of the deceased. Despite receiving dowry in terms of cash and gold items from the parents of the deceased, the accused had extended physical as well as mental harassment, driving the deceased to commit suicide.

4. It further reveals that accused Nos.1 to 4, in furtherance of their common intention and in the course of the same transaction, demanded cash from the parents of the accused and were subjecting her to cruelty by harassing and ill-treating her physically and mentally to meet their demand for dowry. On 30.9.2013 at about 11.30 a.m., Smt. Pushpa @ Pushapalatha, wife of accused No.1 committed suicide by hanging herself by using the veil to an iron rod in the bathroom of her matrimonial house at Housing Board, Chikkamagaluru. It has further transpired that immediately prior thereto accused Nos.1 to 4, in furtherance of their common intention to eliminate the deceased Pushpa @ Pushpalatha, had subjected her to cruelty and harassment which drove her to commit suicide and thereby they had abetted her to commit suicide and were responsible for her death.

5. It is in pursuance of the said act of the accused, on filing of the complaint by the complainant, criminal law was set into motion by recording F.I.R. as per Ex.P18 for the offences stated supra. Subsequent to registration of the crime and also setting the criminal law into motion, the I.O. has conducted the investigation thoroughly and during investigation recorded the statement of the witnesses, conducted spot mahazar at.P3 and also got prepared from PW.12 – Tahsildar the inquest mahazar at Ex.P8 over the dead body of the deceased in the presence of the elderly persons and so also secured the post-mortem report – Ex.P15 from the Doctor who had conducted autopsy over the dead body and so also secured other materials in compliance with section 173(2) Cr.P.C. and thereafter laid the charge sheet against the accused before the committal court. Subsequent to filing of the charge sheet by the Investigating Officer, the case was committed by the trial Court by passing an order as contemplated under sec

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top