SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 129

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Manendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Datt with Siddharth K. Sharma for appellants; Aditya Gupta, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State; Shivam Singh for Objector.

JUDGMENT

1. This criminal appeal has been preferred under section 374 (2) of the Cr.P.C, 1973 against the judgment dated 30.6.2014 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa District Khandwa (M.P.) in ST No.169/2010 whereby, learned Sessions Judge found the appellants guilty for the offence punishable as under :--

S.NO.

NAME OF

APPELLANT

CONVICTION

UNDER SECTION

SENTENCE

FINE

IMPRISONMENT

IN LIEU OF FINE

 

1.

MANENDRA

SINGH

306 OF IPC

 

304-B of IPC

 

498-A OF IPC

 

120-B OF IPC

 

3/4 OF DOWRY

PROHIBITION

ACT

RI FOR 10 YEARS

RI FOR 10 YEARS

RI FOR 2 YEARS

RI FOR 10 YEARS

RI FOR 1 YEAR

Rs.50,000/-

 

NA

 

Rs.10,000/-

 

Rs.50,000/-

 

Rs.10,000/-

1 YEAR RI

 

NIL

 

3 MONTHS RI

 

1 YEAR RI

 

1 MONTH RI

 

2.

 

HARI SINGH

306 OF IPC

 

304 - B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top